Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Apr;11(4):396-399.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014204. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up

Mario Martínez-Galdámez et al. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a routine first-line treatment option for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Pipeline Shield) is an updated version of the PED which has been modified to include a surface phosphorylcholine biocompatible polymer. Its early technical success and safety have been reported previously. Here, we assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Shield for the treatment of IAs.

Materials and methods: The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PFLEX) study was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study for the treatment of unruptured IAs using the Pipeline Shield. The primary endpoint was a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurologic death at 1-year post-procedure. Angiographic outcomes were also assessed by an independent radiology laboratory at 6 months and 1 year.

Results: Fifty patients (mean age, 53 years; 82% female) with 50 unruptured IAs were treated. Mean aneurysm diameter was 8.82±6.15 mm. Of the target aneurysms, 38/50 (76%) were small (<10 mm), 11/50 (22%) were large (≥10 and<25 mm), and 1/50 (2%) was giant (≥25 mm). Forty-seven (94%) were located in the internal carotid artery and three (6%) in the vertebral artery. At 1-year post-procedure, no major strokes or neurologic deaths were reported, and complete occlusion was achieved in 27/33 (81.8%). There were no instances of aneurysm recurrence or retreatment.

Conclusions: Our 1-year follow-up concerning angiographic and safety outcomes corroborate previous evidence that the Pipeline Shield is a safe and effective treatment for IAs.

Trial registration number: NCT02390037.

Keywords: intracranial aneurysm; phosphorylcholine; pipeline embolization device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MM-G serves as a proctor and consultant for Medtronic. SML proctors and consults for Medtronic. TL previously consulted and proctored for Covidien, Stryker, and MicroVention, and currently serves as a proctor and consultant for Sequent Medical. EPB receives honoraria from Medtronic and serves as a consultant for Medtronic.

References

    1. Jiang B, Paff M, Colby GP, et al. . Cerebral aneurysm treatment: modern neurovascular techniques. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2016;1:93–100. 10.1136/svn-2016-000027 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Boccardi E, et al. . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99. 10.1159/000446503 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68. 10.1148/radiol.13120099 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguilar-Salinas P, Brasiliense LB, Gonsales D, et al. . Evaluation of pipeline flex delivery system for the treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016;13:885–97. 10.1080/17434440.2016.1231573 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girdhar G, Li J, Kostousov L, et al. . In-vitro thrombogenicity assessment of flow diversion and aneurysm bridging devices. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2015;40:437–43. 10.1007/s11239-015-1228-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data