Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Nov 29;132(22):2351-2361.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863654. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

EBV/LMP-specific T cells maintain remissions of T- and B-cell EBV lymphomas after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

EBV/LMP-specific T cells maintain remissions of T- and B-cell EBV lymphomas after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Lauren P McLaughlin et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Autologous T cells targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane proteins (LMPs) have shown safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with type 2 latency EBV-associated lymphomas for whom standard therapies have failed, including high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell rescue. However, the safety and efficacy of allogeneic donor-derived LMP-specific T cells (LMP-Ts) have not been established for patients who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of donor-derived LMP-Ts in 26 patients who had undergone allogeneic HSCT for EBV-associated natural killer/T-cell or B-cell lymphomas. Seven patients received LMP-Ts as therapy for active disease, and 19 were treated with adjuvant therapy for high-risk disease. There were no immediate infusion-related toxicities, and only 1 dose-limiting toxicity potentially related to T-cell infusion was seen. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 68%. Additionally, patients who received T-cell therapy while in complete remission after allogeneic HSCT had a 78% OS at 2 years. Patients treated for B-cell disease (n = 10) had a 2-year OS of 80%. Patients with T-cell disease had a 2-year OS of 60%, which suggests an improvement compared with published posttransplantation 2-year OS rates of 30% to 50%. Hence, this study shows that donor-derived LMP-Ts are a safe and effective therapy to prevent relapse after transplantation in patients with B cell- or T cell-derived EBV-associated lymphoma or lymphoproliferative disorder and supports the infusion of LMP-Ts as adjuvant therapy to improve outcomes in the posttransplantation setting. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00062868 and #NCT01956084.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: C.M.B. is on the scientific advisory boards of Cellectis, Torque, and Neximmune and has stock or ownership in Mana Therapeutics; S.G. has a consulting or advisory role with AbbVie, Celgene, and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals and several patent applications (8 focused on cell therapy for cancer, 1 focused on oncolytic viruses, and 1 focused on cancer gene therapy); M.K.B. has stock or ownership in Viracyte and Marker Therapeutics, has a consulting or advisory role with Torque, Unum, and Tessa Therapeutics, and receives research funding from Cell Medica and Tessa Therapeutics; H.E.H. has stock or ownership in Viracyte and Marker Therapeutics, has a consulting or advisory role with Gilead and Novartis, receives research funding from Cell Medica and Tessa Therapeutics, and has patents/royalties/other intellectual property through Cell Medica; C.M.R. has stock or ownership in Viracyte and Marker Therapeutics, has a consulting or advisory role with Cell Medica, CellGenix, and Tessa Therapeutics, receives research support from Tessa Therapeutics, and has a patent application in the field of cellular immunotherapy; and R.R. has received honoraria for serving on a Novartis Treatment Advisory Landscape Advisory Board regarding CAR T-cell commercialization. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Characteristics of LMP-T products. (A) Immunophenotyping at time of cryopreservation showed a predominance of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells. Monocytes and B cells were not present in the final products. (B) A majority of products demonstrated robust LMP2 activity, and all products had EBV activity, as demonstrated by their response to LCLs in interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assays. (C-D) Number of LMP1 and LMP2 epitopes and HLA alleles recognized by LMP-specific product. Although we were not able to identify a specific LMP1 epitope recognized by most products, a majority of products recognized ≥2 LMP2 epitopes and HLA alleles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Hepatic necrosis in a patient after receiving LMP-T infusion. EBER in situ hybridization of liver biopsy showed EBV+ cells along the borders of necrotic hepatic tissue (original magnification ×4) (A), and CD3 immunohistochemical staining reveled numerous T lymphocytes in the same region (original magnification ×10) (B).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Outcomes in patients who received LMP-T products. (A) Two-year EFS. (B) Two-year OS. (C) Patients with B cell–mediated disease had overall improved survival compared with patients with T cell–mediated disease.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
LMP-specific activity of LMP-T products. Responders (Rs) received LMP-T products with slightly higher LMP2-specific and EBV activity (as demonstrated by using LCLs as stimulators in interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assays, which may overlap with LMP1 and/or 2 responses) compared with nonresponders (NRs).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Frequency of LMP2-specific T cells in responding vs nonresponding patients. PB samples at set time points after T-cell infusion were incubated with LMP2 pepmixes and then plated in interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assays. Responding patients (A) had a slightly greater frequency of LMP2-specific T cells than nonresponders (B).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Lymphoma relapse with loss of EBV positivity. (A) A patient who received LMP2-specific T cells as adjuvant therapy after undergoing allogeneic transplantation for an EBV+ HL, as demonstrated by positive LMP1 staining (×40), was noted to have progressive disease shortly after receiving LMP2-specific T cells. (B) However, biopsy of the relapsed lymphoma demonstrated that the tumor was no longer EBV+.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Outcomes for patients who received LMP-Ts as adjuvant therapy vs treatment for active disease. Patients who received LMP-Ts as adjuvant therapy after HSCT had superior 2-year EFS (A) and OS (B) compared with patients who had active disease at the time of LMP-T infusion.

Comment in

References

    1. Stern M, de Wreede LC, Brand R, et al. . Sensitivity of hematological malignancies to graft-versus-host effects: an EBMT megafile analysis. Leukemia. 2014;28(11):2235-2240. - PubMed
    1. Fenske TS, Ahn KW, Graff TM, et al. . Allogeneic transplantation provides durable remission in a subset of DLBCL patients relapsing after autologous transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2016;174(2):235-248. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Küppers R, Engert A, Hansmann ML. Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(10):3439-3447. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grogg KL, Miller RF, Dogan A. HIV infection and lymphoma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(12):1365-1372. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox CP, Haigh TA, Taylor GS, et al. . A novel latent membrane 2 transcript expressed in Epstein-Barr virus-positive NK- and T-cell lymphoproliferative disease encodes a target for cellular immunotherapy. Blood. 2010;116(19):3695-3704. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources