International consensus criteria for diagnosing and staging hand-arm vibration syndrome
- PMID: 30264331
- PMCID: PMC6323073
- DOI: 10.1007/s00420-018-1359-7
International consensus criteria for diagnosing and staging hand-arm vibration syndrome
Abstract
Purpose: In the 30 years since the Stockholm Workshop Scale (SWS) was published, the scientific literature on hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) has grown and experience has been gained in its practical application. This research was undertaken to develop an up-to-date evidence-based classification for HAVS by seeking consensus between experts in the field.
Methods: Seven occupational physicians who are clinically active and have had work published on HAVS in the last 10 years were asked to independently take part in a three-round iterative Delphi process. Consensus was taken when 5/7 (72%) agreed with a particular statement. Experts were asked to provide evidence from the literature or data from their own research to support their views.
Results: Consensus was achieved for most of the questions that were used to develop an updated staging system for HAVS. The vascular and neurological components from the SWS are retained, but ambiguous descriptors and tests without adequately developed methodology such as tactile discrimination, or discriminating power such as grip strength, are not included in the new staging system. A blanching score taken from photographs of the hands during vasospastic episodes is recommended in place of self-recall and frequency of attacks to stage vascular HAVS. Methods with the best evidence base are described for assessing sensory perception and dexterity.
Conclusions: A new classification has been developed with three stages for the clinical classification of vascular and neurological HAVS based on international consensus. We recommend it replaces the SWS for clinical and research purposes.
Keywords: Delphi method; HAVS; Health surveillance; Stockholm Workshop Scale.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
CJMP and IJL work in referral centres that use thermal and vibration perception tests for which their employers receive payment. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required for the Delphi study. Ethical approval to undertake a previous study, some of whose data were reanalysed here, was obtained (Ethcom/reg/01/12).
References
-
- Agnew J, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas CH, Bleecker ML. Purdue pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older. Dev Neuropsychol. 1988;4:29–35. doi: 10.1080/87565648809540388. - DOI
-
- Birke JA, Brandsma JW, Schreuders TAR, Piefer A. Sensory testing with monofilaments in Hansen’s disease and normal control subjects. Int J Leprosy. 2000;68:291–298. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical