Oral nutrition support interventions for patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition: a survey of clinical practice amongst UK dietitians
- PMID: 30264530
- DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12599
Oral nutrition support interventions for patients who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition: a survey of clinical practice amongst UK dietitians
Abstract
Background: Guidance on choosing oral nutritional support strategies varies and the evidence for different approaches is discordant. The present study aimed to examine opinion and practice in the use of oral nutritional support amongst UK dietitians and to assess the factors that influence these clinical decisions.
Methods: The study comprised a cross-sectional, anonymous, national survey of UK dietitians.
Results: There were 207 completed responses (3% response rate). More dietitians reported using combined approaches (COMB) [n = 129 (62%)] over food-based (FB) strategies [n = 70 (34%)] or oral nutritional supplements (ONS) alone [n = 8 (4%)] (N = 207, P < 0.001). Intervention choice was associated with clinical setting and clinical speciality; community dietitians reported more frequent use of FB or ONS alone [n = 48 (59%)] versus COMB [n = 34 (41%)] compared to acute dietitians [COMB: n = 83 (78%) COMB versus FB or ONS alone: n = 24 (22%)] (N = 207, P < 0.0001). Specialist nutrition support dietitians reported more frequent use of FB or ONS alone [n = 22 (54%)] versus COMB [n = 19 (46%)] compared to nonspecialists [FB or ONS alone: n = 17 (45%) versus COMB: n = 21 (55%)] and other specialist dietitians [FB or ONS: n = 39 (30%) alone versus COMB: n = 89 (70%)] (P = 0.017). The greatest influences on choice were ease of implementation [n = 192 (93%)], departmental protocols [n = 184 (89%)], professional management pathways [n = 179 (87%)] and published research [n = 165 (80%)]. Patient circumstances [n = 117 (57%) and n = 99 (48%)] and ease of implementation [n = 35 (17%) and n = 48 (24%)] were reported as most influential in the first and second case scenarios, respectively.
Conclusions: There is a need for further research on approaches to the dietetic management of adult malnutrition.
Keywords: dietary intervention; malnutrition; nutritional management; oral nutrition support.
© 2018 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative exploration of dietitians' experiences of prescribing oral nutritional supplements to patients with malnutrition: A focus on shared tailoring and behaviour change support.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Oct;34(5):858-867. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12867. Epub 2021 Feb 15. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021. PMID: 33586831
-
Research identified variation in nutrition practice by community prescribing dietitians with regards to the identification and management of malnutrition amongst community dwelling adults.Nutr Res. 2020 Apr;76:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 28. Nutr Res. 2020. PMID: 31837829
-
A systematic scoping review of interventions to improve appropriate prescribing of oral nutritional supplements in primary care.Clin Nutr. 2020 Mar;39(3):654-663. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 14. Clin Nutr. 2020. PMID: 30910230
-
Oral nutritional support with or without exercise in the management of malnutrition in nutritionally vulnerable older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec;37(6 Pt A):1879-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 9. Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28969866
-
The use of oral nutritional supplements in an Irish community setting.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009 Dec;22(6):511-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.00981.x. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009. PMID: 19735351
Cited by
-
Disparities in Oral Nutritional Supplement Usage and Dispensing Patterns across Primary Care in Ireland: ONSPres Project.Nutrients. 2022 Jan 14;14(2):338. doi: 10.3390/nu14020338. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35057519 Free PMC article.
-
Oral nutritional interventions in frail older people who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(51):1-112. doi: 10.3310/CCQF1608. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36541454 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical