Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review
- PMID: 30265011
- DOI: 10.1037/bul0000166
Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review
Erratum in
-
"Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review": Correction to Chan, Meissner, and Davis (2018).Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;146(12):1202. doi: 10.1037/bul0000312. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Psychol Bull. 2020. PMID: 33030908
Abstract
A growing body of research has shown that retrieval can enhance future learning of new materials. In the present report, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on this finding, which we term test-potentiated new learning. Our primary objectives were to (a) produce an integrative review of the existing theoretical explanations, (b) summarize the extant empirical data with a meta-analysis, (c) evaluate the existing accounts with the meta-analytic results, and (d) highlight areas that deserve further investigations. Here, we identified four nonexclusive classes of theoretical accounts, including resource accounts, metacognitive accounts, context accounts, and integration accounts. Our quantitative review of the literature showed that testing reliably potentiates the future learning of new materials by increasing correct recall or by reducing erroneous intrusions, and several factors have a powerful impact on whether testing potentiates or impairs new learning. Results of a metaregression analysis provide considerable support for the integration account. Lastly, we discuss areas of under-investigation and possible directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources