Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Oct;86(10):799-809.
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000330.

A randomized trial of contingency management reinforcing attendance at treatment: Do duration and timing of reinforcement matter?

Nancy M Petry  1 , Sheila M Alessi  1 , Carla J Rash  1 , Danielle Barry  1 , Kathleen M Carroll  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized trial of contingency management reinforcing attendance at treatment: Do duration and timing of reinforcement matter?

Nancy M Petry et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Contingency management (CM) interventions that reinforce attendance have rarely been evaluated in terms of reducing drug use. Using a sequential randomized design, this study examined the efficacy of three attendance CM conditions compared to usual care (UC) on drug use outcomes. It evaluated whether the duration (6 vs. 12 weeks) and timing (early vs. later treatment) of CM delivery impact treatment response.

Method: Upon initiating outpatient treatment, patients with cocaine use disorders (N = 360) were randomized to UC or CM for attending treatment for 6 weeks. At week 6, patients (n = 308) were rerandomized to UC or CM for another 6 weeks, with assignment stratified on current functioning. Samples were screened for illicit drugs twice weekly for 12 weeks.

Results: Patients randomized to CM at both time-points attended more sessions and achieved more abstinence than those never randomized to CM. Relative to UC, receiving attendance CM in weeks 1-6 only was not efficacious, but those receiving attendance CM in weeks 7-12 only evidenced some benefits compared to those who never received CM. Twelve weeks of attendance CM was more efficacious than 6 weeks. No between-groups differences in drug use were noted at follow-ups, but days attended treatment and proportion negative samples during treatment were associated with long-term cocaine abstinence.

Conclusions: Attendance-based CM increases treatment participation and reduces drug use, with beneficial effects noted when CM is delivered over longer durations and during later phases of outpatient care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alessi SM, Hanson T, Wieners M, & Petry NM. (2007). Low-cost contingency management in community clinics: Delivering incentives partially in group therapy. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15(3), 293-300. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Matejkowski J, Clements NT, Seymour BL, & Festinger DS. (2014). Prize‐based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: A meta‐analysis. Addiction, 109(9), 1426-1436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bovasso GB, Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, & Cook TG. (2001). Predictive validity of the Addiction Severity Index's composite scores in the assessment of 2-year outcomes in a methadone maintenance population. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 171-176. - PubMed
    1. Branson CE, Barbuti AM, Clemmey P, Herman L, & Bhutia P. (2012). A pilot study of low‐cost contingency management to increase attendance in an adolescent substance abuse program. The American Journal on Addictions, 21(2), 126-129. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources