Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Feb;46(1):187-195.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1021-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis

Leon Guchlerner et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare thick (5 mm) and thin slice images (1.5 mm) of lung, soft tissue, and bone window in thoracoabdominal trauma computed tomography.

Materials and methods: 167 Patients that underwent thoracoabdominal trauma CT between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. CT data were reconstructed in a transverse direction with 5 mm and 1.5 mm slice images of lung, soft tissue, and bone window. Two blinded raters (radiologists) evaluated the collected data by detecting predefined injuries in different organ areas. Reconstruction and evaluation times as well as detected injuries were noted and compared.

Results: Reconstruction and evaluation times were significantly higher with 1.5 mm thin-slice images, and the effect strength according to Rosenthal displayed a strong effect of 0.61 (< 0.1 small effect, 0.3 middle effect, and > 0.5 strong effect). Average evaluation time differences were 62.7 s (33.9 s-91.5 s) in bone window between 1.5 mm and 3 mm for rater 1 (p < 0.001) and 71.4 s (43.1 s-99.7 s) for rater 2 (p < 0.001). Average time differences between 1.5 mm and 5 mm were 68,7 s (43.9 s-93.5 s) for rater 1 and 75.3 s (44.7 s-105.9 s) for rater 2 in lung window (p < 0.001) and 66.6 s (28.8 s-104.4 s) for rater 1 and 114 s (74.4 s-153.6 s) for rater 2 in soft-tissue window (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding soft-tissue and lung injuries, except non-significant improvement in the detection of bone fractures.

Conclusion: Thin-slice images do not bring any significant benefit in thoracoabdominal trauma CT of soft-tissue and lung injuries, but they can be helpful for the diagnosis of bone fractures and incidental findings.

Keywords: Bone; CT diagnostic; Slice thickness; Soft tissue; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Imaging. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):110-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Oct;14(10):1751-60 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 2010 Mar;65(3):193-7 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Radiol. 2000 Nov;36(2):74-80 - PubMed
    1. BMC Emerg Med. 2008 Aug 22;8:10 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources