Teaching and proficiency assessment for arthroscopy in veterinary surgery: A 2017 survey of diplomates and residents of the American and European College of Veterinary Surgeons
- PMID: 30267588
- DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12951
Teaching and proficiency assessment for arthroscopy in veterinary surgery: A 2017 survey of diplomates and residents of the American and European College of Veterinary Surgeons
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Vet Surg. 2019 Jan;48(1):112. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13157. Vet Surg. 2019. PMID: 30657611 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To determine current methods of arthroscopic skills training and proficiency assessment, identify skills considered fundamental to arthroscopy, and evaluate desire for a formal training and assessment program.
Study design: Anonymized electronic survey.
Sample population: Diplomates and residents of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) and European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS).
Methods: An electronic survey was distributed in commercial software (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah). Questions were divided into 4 categories: (1) demographics, (2) arthroscopy experience, (3) teaching, and (4) proficiency assessment. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Comparisons between groups were performed by using χ2 , t tests, and 1-way ANOVA (P ≤ .05).
Results: In total, 429 diplomates and 149 residents responded (response rate 28%). Overall, 80% of respondents trained using clinical cases. Barriers to simulator training included cadaver/simulator availability and time. Skills deemed most fundamental included anatomic knowledge, precise portal placement, triangulation, and image orientation. Overall, 90% of respondents supported a formal training program with requirement to demonstrate proficiency; 80% believed this should be part of standard ACVS/ECVS residency training.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic skills are taught by using clinical cases, with subjective proficiency assessment. Fundamental skills are those that may be taught using simulators. There is enthusiasm for formal arthroscopic skills training and assessment.
Clinical significance: Improved acquisition and assessment of fundamental arthroscopic skills is indicated. A validated methodology for formal training using simulators, minimizing morbidity, and facilitating objective evaluation is warranted. This is the first phase of a project to develop and validate a simulator program.
© 2018 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgery in veterinary practice: a 2010 survey of diplomates and residents of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons.Vet Surg. 2013 Aug;42(6):635-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12025.x. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Vet Surg. 2013. PMID: 23808834
-
Perception of Teaching and Assessing Technical Proficiency in American College of Veterinary Surgeons Small Animal Surgery Residency Programs.Vet Surg. 2015 Aug;44(6):790-7. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12342. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Vet Surg. 2015. PMID: 26088320
-
Perceptions and experience of veterinary surgery residents with minimally invasive surgery simulation training.Vet Surg. 2020 Jun;49 Suppl 1:O21-O27. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13295. Epub 2019 Aug 6. Vet Surg. 2020. PMID: 31385334
-
Utility of Modern Arthroscopic Simulator Training Models: A Meta-analysis and Updated Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1650-1677. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.048. Epub 2018 Jan 20. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29366742
-
The role of virtual reality in knee arthroscopic simulation: a systematic review.Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Mar;107(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00732-9. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023. PMID: 34655024
Cited by
-
Approaches to Laparoscopic Training in Veterinary Medicine: A Review of Personalized Simulators.Animals (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;13(24):3781. doi: 10.3390/ani13243781. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136818 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources