Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jan;107(1):143-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.069. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

Outcomes of Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement in Children

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Outcomes of Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement in Children

Chizitam Ibezim et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve anomalies in children are rare but frequently severe, recalcitrant, and not often amenable to primary repair, necessitating mechanical mitral valve replacement (M-MVR). This study examined outcomes of a cohort undergoing a first M-MVR at age younger than 21 years.

Methods: We queried the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, a multi-institutional United States-based cardiac intervention registry, for patients undergoing first M-MVR for 2-ventricle congenital heart disease. Survival and transplant status through 2014 were obtained from Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium and linkage with the National Death Index and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

Results: We identified 441 patients (median age, 4.3 years; interquartile range, 1.3 to 10.1 years) meeting study criteria. The commonest disease necessitating M-MVR was atrioventricular canal (44.3%). Early mortality (death <90 days after M-MVR) was 11.1%; there was increased risk of early death if age at M-MVR was younger than 2 years (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 56.6) and with concurrent other mechanical valve placement (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 35.6). In those surviving more than 90 days after M-MVR, transplant-free survival was 76% at 20 years of follow-up (median follow-up, 16.6 years; interquartile range, 11.9 to 21.3 years). Adjusted analysis in those who survived more than 90 days showed elevated risk of death/transplant for boys (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3), age at M-MVR younger than 2 years (10-year survival: hazard ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 15.1), and nonbileaflet prosthesis placement (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3).

Conclusions: M-MVR is a viable strategy in children with unrepairable mitral valve disease. Age younger than 2 years at the first M-MVR is associated with significant early risk of death and poorer long-term survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Age at 1st-M-MVR among eligible children treated <21 years of age for congenital mitral valve abnormalities in the PCCC
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Early mortality (≤90 days post-1st M-MVR), late mortality/cardiac transplant (>90 days post-1st M-MVR) and transplant free survivors by age at 1st-M-MVR. (b) Proportional illustration representing the age of mortality / cardiac transplant in patients undergoing M-MVR. Within cohort percentages in each age group are depicted on Y axis. Early mortality / cardiac transplant is predominant in those < 2 years of age at 1st M-MVR, late mortality / cardiac transplant is more evenly distributed across the age groups.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Early mortality (≤90 days post-1st M-MVR), late mortality/cardiac transplant (>90 days post-1st M-MVR) and transplant free survivors by age at 1st-M-MVR. (b) Proportional illustration representing the age of mortality / cardiac transplant in patients undergoing M-MVR. Within cohort percentages in each age group are depicted on Y axis. Early mortality / cardiac transplant is predominant in those < 2 years of age at 1st M-MVR, late mortality / cardiac transplant is more evenly distributed across the age groups.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Overall transplant-free survival (including early and late mortality / cardiac transplant) after 1st M-MVR
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) Transplant-free survival from 1st cardiac surgery in patients with underlying CAVC compared between those receiving M-MVR before the age of 6 years and patients who did not require M-MVR (b) Hazard of death / cardiac transplant over time from 1st cardiac surgery in patients < 6 years of age with underlying CAVC who had M-MVR compared to patients who did not require M-MVR.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(a) Transplant-free survival from 1st cardiac surgery in patients with underlying CAVC compared between those receiving M-MVR before the age of 6 years and patients who did not require M-MVR (b) Hazard of death / cardiac transplant over time from 1st cardiac surgery in patients < 6 years of age with underlying CAVC who had M-MVR compared to patients who did not require M-MVR.

Comment in

References

    1. Ackermann K, Balling G, Eicken A, Gunther T, Schreiber C, Hess J. Replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve with a mechanical prosthesis in children aged less than 6 years: Late clinical results of survival and subsequent replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:750–756. - PubMed
    1. Beierlein W, Becker V, Yates R, et al. Long-term follow-up after mitral valve replacement in childhood: poor event-free survival in the young child. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:860–865. - PubMed
    1. Henaine R, Nloga J, Wautot F, et al. Long-Term Outcome After Annular Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement in Children Aged Less Than Five Years. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:1570–1576. - PubMed
    1. Caldarone CA, Raghuveer G, Hills CB, et al. Long-term survival after mitral valve replacement in children aged <5 years: a multi-institutional study. Circulation 2001; 104:I-143-I-147. - PubMed
    1. Vohra HA, Laker S, Stumper O, et al. Predicting the performance of mitral prostheses implanted in children under 5 years of age. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:688–692. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms