Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 7;17(12):4051-4060.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00485. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

Expanding the Use of Spectral Libraries in Proteomics

Affiliations
Review

Expanding the Use of Spectral Libraries in Proteomics

Eric W Deutsch et al. J Proteome Res. .

Abstract

The 2017 Dagstuhl Seminar on Computational Proteomics provided an opportunity for a broad discussion on the current state and future directions of the generation and use of peptide tandem mass spectrometry spectral libraries. Their use in proteomics is growing slowly, but there are multiple challenges in the field that must be addressed to further increase the adoption of spectral libraries and related techniques. The primary bottlenecks are the paucity of high quality and comprehensive libraries and the general difficulty of adopting spectral library searching into existing workflows. There are several existing spectral library formats, but none captures a satisfactory level of metadata; therefore, a logical next improvement is to design a more advanced, Proteomics Standards Initiative-approved spectral library format that can encode all of the desired metadata. The group discussed a series of metadata requirements organized into three designations of completeness or quality, tentatively dubbed bronze, silver, and gold. The metadata can be organized at four different levels of granularity: at the collection (library) level, at the individual entry (peptide ion) level, at the peak (fragment ion) level, and at the peak annotation level. Strategies for encoding mass modifications in a consistent manner and the requirement for encoding high-quality and commonly seen but as-yet-unidentified spectra were discussed. The group also discussed related topics, including strategies for comparing two spectra, techniques for generating representative spectra for a library, approaches for selection of optimal signature ions for targeted workflows, and issues surrounding the merging of two or more libraries into one. We present here a review of this field and the challenges that the community must address in order to accelerate the adoption of spectral libraries in routine analysis of proteomics datasets.

Keywords: Dagstuhl Seminar; Proteomics Standards Initiative; formats; mass spectrometry; meeting report; spectral libraries; standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nesvizhskii AI A Survey of Computational Methods and Error Rate Estimation Procedures for Peptide and Protein Identification in Shotgun Proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73 (11), 2092–2123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eng JK; Searle BC; Clauser KR; Tabb DL A Face in the Crowd: Recognizing Peptides through Database Search. Mol. Cell. Proteomics MCP 2011, 10 (11), R111.009522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang X; Li Y; Shao W; Lam H Understanding the Improved Sensitivity of Spectral Library Searching over Sequence Database Searching in Proteomics Data Analysis. Proteomics 2011, 11 (6), 1075–1085. - PubMed
    1. Venable JD; Dong M-Q; Wohlschlegel J; Dillin A; Yates JR Automated Approach for Quantitative Analysis of Complex Peptide Mixtures from Tandem Mass Spectra. Nat. Methods 2004, 1 (1), 39–45. - PubMed
    1. Silva JC; Denny R; Dorschel CA; Gorenstein M; Kass IJ; Li G-Z; McKenna T; Nold MJ; Richardson K; Young P; et al. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs. Anal. Chem 2005, 77 (7), 2187–2200. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances