Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 17:12:1801-1807.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S176025. eCollection 2018.

Macular phototoxicity after corneal cross-linking

Affiliations

Macular phototoxicity after corneal cross-linking

Paulo Rodolfo Tagliari Barbisan et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess potential vascular, structural, and functional changes to the macula in patients with keratoconus that underwent ultraviolet A (UVA)-riboflavin-mediated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) therapy.

Patients and methods: Seventeen eyes from 17 patients of age 16 years or older with keratoconus undergoing CXL treatment were studied. The same eye served as its own control (before CXL vs after CXL). Eyes were evaluated in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, intraocular pressure, Amsler grid, retinography, fluorescein angiography, autofluorescence, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) prior to CXL and 7 and 30 days after treatment. Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was recorded prior to and 7 days after CXL.

Results: Mean (SD) BCVA by logMAR chart was 0.47 (±0.12) pre-CXL, 0.55 (±0.15) 7 days post-CXL (P=0.57), and 0.46 (±0.10) 30 days post-CXL (P=0.87). Mean (SD) SD-OCT central macular thickness (µm) was 253.62 (±20.9) pre-CXL, 260.5 (±18.7) 7 days post-CXL (P=0.48), and 256.44 (±21.6) 30 days post-CXL (P=0.69). In 12 eyes, mfERG revealed a statistically significant increase (P=0.0353) in P1 latency (ms) of ring four from the pre-CXL period (39.45±2.05) to 7 days post-CXL (41.04±1.28) period. Regression analysis showed that the increase in P1 latency was correlated with the increase in central macular thickness (P=0.027). Furthermore, nine patients experienced a significant decrease in P1 amplitudes of rings 1 (P=0.0014), 2 (P=0.0029), 3 (P=0.0037), 4 (P=0.0014), and 5 (P=0.0012) from pre-CXL to 7 days post-CXL. Conclusion: In this pilot study, most of the patients exhibited slight changes in their mfERG parameters and OCT thickness, despite a lack of vascular abnormalities observed on fluorescein angiography/autofluorescence imaging, no alteration in BCVA, and no reports of symptoms. These changes could, therefore, be categorized as a mild subclinical effect of the corneal cross-linking procedure.

Keywords: UVA; crosslinking; keratoconus; light damage; multifocal electroretinogram; phototoxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
P1 latency (ms) of ring 4 region. Data from before CXL and 7 days after CXL. Paired t-test. Notes: *P<0.05. Data presented as mean±SD. Abbreviation: CXL, corneal collagen cross-linking.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot for changes in macular thickness and P1 latency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
P1 amplitude (nV/deg2) of rings 1–5. Notes: Data from before crosslinking (pre-CXL) and from 7 days after crosslinking (post-CXL). Paired t-test. Data presented as mean±SD. Abbreviation: CXL, corneal collagen cross-linking.

References

    1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319. - PubMed
    1. Mas Tur V, Macgregor C, Jayaswal R, O’Brart D, Maycock N. A review of keratoconus: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(6):770–783. - PubMed
    1. Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–172. - PubMed
    1. Mandell RB. Keratoconus. In: Mandell RB, editor. Contact Lens Practice. 4th ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1988. pp. 824–849.
    1. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AD, Rice NS. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye. 1990;4(Pt 5):673–688. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources