Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 13:13:1739-1746.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S171049. eCollection 2018.

Magnitude of dural tube compression does not show a predictive value for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis for 1-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study in the community

Koji Otani  1 , Shin-Ichi Kikuchi  1 , Takuya Nikaido  1 , Shin-Ichi Konno  1
Affiliations

Magnitude of dural tube compression does not show a predictive value for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis for 1-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study in the community

Koji Otani et al. Clin Interv Aging. .

Abstract

Background: The North American Spine Society states that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a clinical syndrome, and there is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for or against a correlation between clinical symptoms or function and the presence of anatomic narrowing of the spinal canal on MRI. The main purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the magnitude of dural tube compression on MRI on LSS symptoms at the cross-sectional and 1-year follow-up.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 459 participants who were assessed for LSS using a questionnaire and conventional MRI of the lumbar spine. After 1 year, 335 subjects (follow-up rate 73.0%) were assessed for LSS using the same questionnaire. The time course of the clinical subjective symptoms of LSS and the relationship between the said symptoms of LSS and magnitude of dural tube compression on MRI were analyzed in a cross-sectional and longitudinal fashion.

Results: 1) The dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) decreased with age. 2) Severe dural tube compression had a strong influence on the presence of symptomatic LSS; however, 40%-70% of participants with severe dural tube compression did not show clinical symptoms of LSS. 3) At the 1-year follow-up, >50% of the LSS-positive participants in the initial year were reclassified as LSS negative, and 10% of the LSS-negative participants were reclassified as LSS positive. 4) The magnitude of the DCSA on MRI did not directly affect the presence of LSS at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: LSS symptoms were changeable. Anatomical dural tube compression on MRI did not predict the presence of clinical LSS symptoms at the 1-year follow-up.

Keywords: MRI; comorbidities; cross-sectional area; epidemiology; lumbar spinal stenosis; natural history; prognostic factors; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure All authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. This study was presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (May 2012, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

References

    1. North American Spine Society Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. [Accessed January 12, 2018]. Available from: https://www.spine.org/Documents/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/LumbarSt....
    1. Takahashi N, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Otani K, Konno S. Diagnostic value of the lumbar extension-loading test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dyck P, Doyle JB. “Bicycle test” of van Gelderen in diagnosis of intermittent cauda equina compression syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1977;46(5):667–670. - PubMed
    1. Dong G, Porter RW. Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14(9):965–969. - PubMed
    1. Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz JN. Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? JAMA. 2010;304(23):2628–2636. - PMC - PubMed