Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;106(4):531-541.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches

Affiliations

A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches

Wichor M Bramer et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Creating search strategies for systematic reviews, finding the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, and translating search strategies between databases is challenging. Several methods describe standards for systematic search strategies, but a consistent approach for creating an exhaustive search strategy has not yet been fully described in enough detail to be fully replicable. The authors have established a method that describes step by step the process of developing a systematic search strategy as needed in the systematic review. This method describes how single-line search strategies can be prepared in a text document by typing search syntax (such as field codes, parentheses, and Boolean operators) before copying and pasting search terms (keywords and free-text synonyms) that are found in the thesaurus. To help ensure term completeness, we developed a novel optimization technique that is mainly based on comparing the results retrieved by thesaurus terms with those retrieved by the free-text search words to identify potentially relevant candidate search terms. Macros in Microsoft Word have been developed to convert syntaxes between databases and interfaces almost automatically. This method helps information specialists in developing librarian-mediated searches for systematic reviews as well as medical and health care practitioners who are searching for evidence to answer clinical questions. The described method can be used to create complex and comprehensive search strategies for different databases and interfaces, such as those that are needed when searching for relevant references for systematic reviews, and will assist both information specialists and practitioners when they are searching the biomedical literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema for determining the optimal order of elements
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of translation between databases used at Erasmus University Medical Center Dotted lines represent databases that are used in less than 80% of the searches.

References

    1. Harris MR. The librarian’s roles in the systematic review process: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):81–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Wiley Online Library. 2008. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.
    1. University of York, N.H.S. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York, UK: CRD, University of York; 2009.
    1. Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):944–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources