Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 13:9:1024.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01024. eCollection 2018.

Vortioxetine Differentially Modulates MK-801-Induced Changes in Visual Signal Detection Task Performance and Locomotor Activity

Affiliations

Vortioxetine Differentially Modulates MK-801-Induced Changes in Visual Signal Detection Task Performance and Locomotor Activity

Todd M Hillhouse et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Attention impairment is a common feature of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and MDD-associated cognitive dysfunction may play an important role in determining functional status among this patient population. Vortioxetine is a multimodal antidepressant that may improve some aspects of cognitive function in MDD patients, and may indirectly increase glutamate neurotransmission in brain regions classically associated with attention function. Previous non-clinical research suggests that vortioxetine has limited effects on attention. This laboratory previously found that vortioxetine did not improve attention function in animals impaired by acute scopolamine administration, using the visual signal detection task (VSDT). However, vortioxetine has limited effects on acetylcholinergic neurotransmission, and thus it is possible that attention impaired by other mechanisms would be attenuated by vortioxetine. This study sought to investigate whether acute vortioxetine administration can attenuate VSDT impairments and hyperlocomotion induced by the non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801. We found that acute vortioxetine administration had no effect on VSDT performance on its own, but potentiated MK-801-induced VSDT impairments. Furthermore, vortioxetine had no effect on locomotor activity on its own, and did not alter MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion. We further investigated whether vortioxetine's effect on MK-801 could be driven by a kinetic interaction, but found that plasma and brain exposure for vortioxetine and MK-801 were similar whether administered alone or in combination. Thus, it appears that vortioxetine selectively potentiates MK-801-induced impairments in attention without altering its effects on locomotion, and further that this interaction must be pharmacodynamic in nature. A theoretical mechanism for this interaction is discussed.

Keywords: MK-801; attention; locomotor activity; visual signal detection task; vortioxetine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Vortioxetine potentiates MK-801-induced visual signal detection task impairments, but has no effects on its own. Left-side panels represent dependent measures related to signal trials, while those on the right represent dependent measures related to blank trials. (A,B) Represent hits or correct rejections, respectively. (C,D) Represent response latencies recorded during the relevant trial type, while (E,F) represent the frequency of omissions recorded during each trial type. 0.1 mg/kg MK-801 administration (30 min s.c.) induced significant, signal intensity-dependent impairments in hits (A), correct rejections (B), and increased response latencies during signal trials (C) compared to vehicle controls. 10 mg/kg vortioxetine (1 h s.c.) did not significantly alter performance in any dependent measure on its own. The combination of vortioxetine + MK-801 induced significantly greater impairments in hits, correct rejections, response latencies (C,D), and omissions (E,F). Asterisks represent significant differences from the Veh + Veh group (P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001). Plus signs represent significant differences from the Vor + Veh group (+P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, +++P < 0.001). Number signs represent significant differences from the Veh + MK-801 group (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amalric M., Ouagazzal A., Baunez C., Nieoullon A. (1994). Functional interactions between glutamate and dopamine in the rat striatum. Neurochem. Int. 25 123–131. 10.1016/0197-0186(94)90031-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auger M. L., Meccia J., Floresco S. B. (2017). Regulation of sustained attention, false alarm responding and implementation of conditional rules by prefrontal GABAA transmission: comparison with NMDA transmission. Psychopharmacology 234 2777–2792. 10.1007/s00213-017-4670-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baarendse P. J., Vanderschuren L. J. (2012). Dissociable effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on distinct forms of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 219 313–326. 10.1007/s00213-011-2576-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakroborty S., Geisbush T. R., Dale E., Pehrson A. L., Sanchez C., West A. R. (2017). Impact of vortioxetine on synaptic integration in prefrontal-subcortical circuits: comparisons with escitalopram. Front. Pharmacol. 8:764. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00764 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins P. Y., Patel V., Joestl S. S., March D., Insel T. R., Daar A. S., et al. (2011). Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature 475 27–30. 10.1038/475027a - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources