Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 1;9(5):861-868.
doi: 10.14336/AD.2017.1215. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S)

Affiliations

Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S)

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores et al. Aging Dis. .

Abstract

The Bristol Foot Score is considered an instrument for measuring the impact of foot problems and pain. It was developed and validated in United Kingdom. Therefore, this aim was to perform the transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. The recommended forward/backward translation protocol was applied for the procedure of translation, transcultural adaptation and validation to Spain. Considering each domain and question, internal consistency and reliability were analyzed through the Crombach alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A very good internal consistency was shown for the 3 domains: concern and pain showed a Cronbach of 0.896, footwear and general foot health of 0.790, mobility 0.887. Each question had a very good test-retest reliability, ranged from 0.721 to 0.963 with no systematic differences (P>0.05) in each question of the Spanish Bristol Foot Score (BFS-S) questionnaire. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC 95%): concern and foot pain 0.950 (0.913-0971); footwear and general foot health 0.914 (0.851-0.950), mobility 0.973 (0.953-0.984) and there were no sistematic differences in any domain (P > 0.05). The BFS-S was shown to be a valid and reliable tool with an acceptable use in the Spanish population.

Keywords: foot; health impact assessment; quality of life; validation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Bland-Altman plot showing the agreement between test and retest for the mobility (A), concern and pain (B), and footwear and general health (C) domains.

References

    1. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T (1998). Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 88:419-428. - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen JE, Andreasen J, Rathleff MS (2015). Translation and validation of the Danish Foot Function Index (FFI-DK). Scand J Med Sci Sports, 25:e408-13. - PubMed
    1. Gijon-Nogueron G, Ndosi M, Luque-Suarez A, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Munuera PV, Garrow A, et al. (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index into Spanish. Qual Life Res, 23:571-579. - PubMed
    1. Paez-Moguer J, Budiman-Mak E, Cuesta-Vargas AI (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index to Spanish. Foot Ankle Surg, 20:34-39. - PubMed
    1. Hawke F, Burns J (2009). Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain. J Foot Ankle Res, 2:1. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources