Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 13:(139):57006.
doi: 10.3791/57006.

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)

Affiliations

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)

George M Solomon et al. J Vis Exp. .

Abstract

We describe a standardized measurement of nasal potential difference (NPD). In this technique, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) function are monitored by the change in voltage across the nasal epithelium after the superfusion of solutions that modify ion channel activity. This is enabled by the measurement of the potential difference between the subcutaneous compartment and the airway epithelium in the nostril, utilizing a catheter in contact with the inferior nasal turbinate. The test allows the measurement of the stable baseline voltage and the successive net voltage changes after perfusion of 100 µM amiloride, an inhibitor of Na+ reabsorption in Ringer's solution; a chloride-free solution containing amiloride to drive chloride secretion and 10 µM isoproterenol in a chloride-free solution with amiloride to stimulate the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent chloride conductance related to CFTR. This technique has the advantage of demonstrating the electrophysiological properties of two key components establishing the hydration of the airway surface liquid of the respiratory epithelium, ENaC, and CFTR. Therefore, it is a useful research tool for phase 2 and proof of concept trials of agents that target CFTR and ENaC activity for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. It is also a key follow-up procedure to establish CFTR dysfunction when genetic testing and sweat testing are equivocal. Unlike sweat chloride, the test is relatively more time consuming and costly. It also requires operator training and expertise to conduct the test effectively. Inter- and intra-subject variability has been reported in this technique especially in young or uncooperative subjects. To assist with this concern, interpretation has been improved through a recently validated algorithm.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rosenstein B. What is a Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis? Clinics in Chest Medicine. 1998;19:423–441. - PubMed
    1. Rosenstein B, Cutting GR. The Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: A Consensus Statement: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Panel. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1998;132:589–595. - PubMed
    1. Farrell PM, et al. Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2017;181:S4–S15. - PubMed
    1. Mesbahi M, et al. Changes of CFTR functional measurements and clinical improvements in cystic fibrosis patients with non-p.Gly551Asp gating mutations treated with ivacaftor. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2017;16:45–48. - PubMed
    1. Accurso F, et al. Sweat chloride as a biomarker of CFTR activity: proof of concept and ivacaftor clinical trial data. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2014;13(2):139–147. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types