Preoperative pad usage is independently associated with failure of non-adjustable male trans-obturator slings in otherwise well-selected patients
- PMID: 30273118
- PMCID: PMC6456352
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5468
Preoperative pad usage is independently associated with failure of non-adjustable male trans-obturator slings in otherwise well-selected patients
Abstract
Introduction: Our objective was to determine which clinical factors are associated with failure to achieve continence after nonadjustable trans-obturator sling in otherwise well-selected men undergoing treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).
Methods: A retrospective review of AdVance/AdVance™ XP male sling procedures was performed from December 2006 to May 2017. Patients with known risk factors for sling failure, including severe incontinence (>5 pads), radiation therapy, or detrusor dysfunction, were excluded. The primary outcome was failure to achieve continence, defined as ≤1 pad per day when pad use was ≥2 preoperatively (or 0 pads if preoperative pad use was 1). Covariates included patient age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), diabetes, obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥35), type of prostatectomy, and number of preoperative pads. Descriptive statistics and Cox regression analysis was performed.
Results: Of 158 patients, continence was achieved in 82.3% (n=130) with a mean followup of 42.7 months. Patient-reported satisfaction was 86.7% (n=137) and the 90-day complication rate was 12% (n=19). On univariate Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p=0.02), CCI (p=0.02), and preoperative pad use (p<0.0001) were associated with sling failure, whereas obesity (p=0.95), diabetes (p=0.49), and type of prostatectomy (p=0.88) were not. On multivariate analysis, only increasing preoperative pad use remained associated with sling failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-16; p=0.008). Patients wearing >3 pads per day were more likely to experience failure (35.5% vs. 13.4%; p=0.007).
Conclusions: Increasing preoperative pad use is independently associated with an increased risk of failure after non-adjustable sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence in otherwise well-selected patients.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Pro-ACT™ device implantation efficiency in second line treatment of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence after sub-urethral male sling failure].Prog Urol. 2019 Jan;29(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 19. Prog Urol. 2019. PMID: 30344105 French.
-
AdVance/AdVance XP transobturator male slings: preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome.Urology. 2013 May;81(5):1034-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 7. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23465151
-
Multicentered Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Failure of the Adjustable TransObturator Male System (ATOMS).Urology. 2021 Feb;148:280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.045. Epub 2020 Nov 10. Urology. 2021. PMID: 33181122
-
Short-term evaluation of the adjustable bulbourethral male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 Apr;11(2):O111-O116. doi: 10.1111/luts.12227. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019. PMID: 29869450
-
Male Slings for Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):575-592. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Eur Urol Focus. 2020. PMID: 30718160
Cited by
-
Surgical management of post prostatectomy incontinence.Prostate Int. 2024 Jun;12(2):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 27. Prostate Int. 2024. PMID: 39036757 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Differentiated surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence-between intention and reality?].Urologe A. 2019 Jun;58(6):640-650. doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-0947-9. Urologe A. 2019. PMID: 31089755 Review. German.
-
Narrative review of male urethral sling for post-prostatectomy stress incontinence: sling type, patient selection, and clinical applications.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2682-2694. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1459. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34295753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guiding Clinical Decision Making for Surgical Incontinence Treatment After Prostatectomy: A Review of the Literature.Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Nov;24(11):527-532. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01181-6. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Curr Urol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37768551 Review.
-
Impact of obesity on male urethral sling outcomes.Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Jun 9;12:1756287220927997. doi: 10.1177/1756287220927997. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2020. PMID: 32565915 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources