Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;13(4):120-124.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5468. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Preoperative pad usage is independently associated with failure of non-adjustable male trans-obturator slings in otherwise well-selected patients

Affiliations

Preoperative pad usage is independently associated with failure of non-adjustable male trans-obturator slings in otherwise well-selected patients

Logan Zemp et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective was to determine which clinical factors are associated with failure to achieve continence after nonadjustable trans-obturator sling in otherwise well-selected men undergoing treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).

Methods: A retrospective review of AdVance/AdVance XP male sling procedures was performed from December 2006 to May 2017. Patients with known risk factors for sling failure, including severe incontinence (>5 pads), radiation therapy, or detrusor dysfunction, were excluded. The primary outcome was failure to achieve continence, defined as ≤1 pad per day when pad use was ≥2 preoperatively (or 0 pads if preoperative pad use was 1). Covariates included patient age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), diabetes, obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥35), type of prostatectomy, and number of preoperative pads. Descriptive statistics and Cox regression analysis was performed.

Results: Of 158 patients, continence was achieved in 82.3% (n=130) with a mean followup of 42.7 months. Patient-reported satisfaction was 86.7% (n=137) and the 90-day complication rate was 12% (n=19). On univariate Cox regression analysis, increasing age (p=0.02), CCI (p=0.02), and preoperative pad use (p<0.0001) were associated with sling failure, whereas obesity (p=0.95), diabetes (p=0.49), and type of prostatectomy (p=0.88) were not. On multivariate analysis, only increasing preoperative pad use remained associated with sling failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-16; p=0.008). Patients wearing >3 pads per day were more likely to experience failure (35.5% vs. 13.4%; p=0.007).

Conclusions: Increasing preoperative pad use is independently associated with an increased risk of failure after non-adjustable sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence in otherwise well-selected patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier curve of (A) overall postoperative continence after AdVance/AdVance XP male sling; and (B) survival curve of postoperative continence rates stratified by preoperative pad number ≤3 pads per day (black) or 4–5 pads per day (grey). Log-rank p=0.007.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA. 2000;283:354–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.3.354. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, et al. Population based study of long-term rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188:502–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy NY, Rourke KF. Stemming the tide of mild to moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence: A retrospective comparison of transobturator male slings and the artificial urinary sphincter. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:273–7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter vs. male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence — what do patients choose? J Urol. 2009;181:1231–5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Viers BR, VanDyke ME, Pagliara TJ, et al. Improving male sling selectivity and outcomes — a potential role for physical demonstration of stress urinary incontinence severity? Urol Pract. 2018;5:458–65. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.10.002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources