Evaluation of models for analysis of radioligand binding data
- PMID: 3027522
Evaluation of models for analysis of radioligand binding data
Abstract
In the presence of agonists, many neurotransmitter receptors interact with regulatory components, resulting in the formation of a ternary complex composed of agonist, receptor, and a regulatory component, and in biphasic or shallow dose response curves for inhibition of the binding of a radiolabeled antagonist by agonists. Complex dose response curves are often analyzed using equations that describe a model that assumes the presence of two independent populations of receptors (two-independent-receptor model) or equations that describe a model that assumes the reversible interaction of agonist-occupied receptors with a regulatory component (ternary complex model). In this study, the ability of these models to provide good estimates of the concentration of the regulatory component and of the affinities involved in formation of the ternary complex was evaluated. Dose response curves were generated by a computer using an equation that describes the ternary complex model. Analysis of the dose response curves with the two-independent-receptor model resulted in good estimates of the concentration of the regulatory component and of the affinity of the receptor for the agonist. Reliable estimates of the other affinity constants that relate to formation of the ternary complex could not be obtained. Analysis of the dose response curves with the ternary complex model resulted in good estimates of the concentration of the regulatory component and of the affinity constants that relate to formation of the ternary complex. Random error was added to the data points that made up the dose response curves to simulate error observed in experiments with biological systems. Analysis of the dose response curves that contained random error with the two-independent-receptor model yielded results similar to those obtained from analysis of dose response curves that did not contain random error. Analysis of the dose response curves that contained random error with the ternary complex model resulted in good estimates of the concentration of the regulatory component and of the affinity of the receptor for the agonist. However, reliable estimates of the other affinity constants involved in formation of the ternary complex could not be obtained. Thus, caution should be exercised when interpreting results of the analysis of dose response curves with either the two-independent-receptor model or the ternary complex model.
Similar articles
-
Agonist high and low affinity state ratios predict drug intrinsic activity and a revised ternary complex mechanism at serotonin 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors.Synapse. 2000 Feb;35(2):144-50. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(200002)35:2<144::AID-SYN7>3.0.CO;2-K. Synapse. 2000. PMID: 10611640
-
The ternary complex model. Its properties and application to ligand interactions with the D2-dopamine receptor of the anterior pituitary gland.Mol Pharmacol. 1984 Sep;26(2):214-27. Mol Pharmacol. 1984. PMID: 6237254
-
Theoretical effects of single and multiple transducer receptor coupling proteins on estimates of the relative potency of agonists.Mol Pharmacol. 1989 Feb;35(2):214-22. Mol Pharmacol. 1989. PMID: 2537459
-
G protein activation by G protein coupled receptors: ternary complex formation or catalyzed reaction?Biochem Pharmacol. 2004 Sep 1;68(5):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.05.044. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15294442 Review.
-
Agonism and inverse agonism at dopamine D2-like receptors.Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl. 1999 Apr;26:S3-9. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl. 1999. PMID: 10386247 Review.
Cited by
-
Characterization of the bisphosphonate recognition site on hydroxyapatite using radioligand binding techniques with [14C]citric acid.Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 May;52(5):372-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00310202. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993. PMID: 8389237
-
Analysis of agonist-antagonist interactions at A1 adenosine receptors.Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Jul;38(1):72-83. Mol Pharmacol. 1990. PMID: 2115114 Free PMC article.
-
Mono- and divalent cations modulate the affinities of brain D1 and D2 receptors for dopamine by a mechanism independent of receptor coupling to guanyl nucleotide binding proteins.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1989 Apr;339(4):374-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00736050. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1989. PMID: 2500603
-
Apparent heterogeneity of cardiac A1 adenosine receptors as revealed by radioligand binding experiments on N-ethylmaleimide-treated membranes.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1991 Dec;344(6):639-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00174747. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1991. PMID: 1775196 Free PMC article.