Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Feb;31(2):200-7.

In vivo effects of mercury (II) on deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase, DNA polymerase (alpha, beta), and uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in cultured human cells: relationship to DNA damage, DNA repair, and cytotoxicity

In vivo effects of mercury (II) on deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase, DNA polymerase (alpha, beta), and uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in cultured human cells: relationship to DNA damage, DNA repair, and cytotoxicity

M V Williams et al. Mol Pharmacol. 1987 Feb.

Abstract

The effect of mercuric acetate on the activities of deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase), DNA polymerase (alpha, beta), and uracil-DNA glycosylase has been studied in cultured human KB cells. There was a dose- and time-dependent inactivation of both dUTPase and DNA polymerase alpha activities by mercuric acetate. In cells exposed to low concentrations (10 microM) of mercuric acetate, dUTPase was most sensitive to inhibition with 30% of the activity being inhibited after a 1-hr exposure. At higher concentrations or for longer exposure times, DNA polymerase alpha was most sensitive to inhibition with greater than 60% of the activity being inhibited by 25 microM mercuric acetate after a 15-min exposure. There was no inhibition of DNA polymerase beta or uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in cells exposed to 50 microM mercuric acetate for 90 min. In fact, there was a time- and dose-dependent activation of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity with maximum activation occurring in cells exposed to 50 microM mercuric acetate. The inhibition of dUTPase and DNA polymerase alpha activities and the activation of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity correlated with the induction of single-strand breaks in DNA by mercuric acetate and with the decrease in cell viability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of mercuric acetate on dUTPase, DNA polymerase (α,β), and uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in KB cells. Intact cells were exposed to various concentrations of mercuric acetate for the times indicated. Cell extracts were prepared and enzymatic assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Extracts were assayed simultaneously for the various enzymes. The values represent the average ± the standard deviation for three experiments. A, dUTPase; B, DNA polymerase α; C, uracil-DNA glycosylase; D, DNA polymerase β. △ untreated; ○, 5 μM; ●, 10 μM; ■, 25 μM; □, 50 μM mercuric acetate.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of mercuric acetate on protein synthesis. Cells were preexposed to various concentrations of mercuric acetate for the times indicated and protein synthesis was then determined as described in Materials and Methods. The values represent the average of at least two experiments ± the standard deviation. [3H]Leucine incorporation in untreated controls was 55,563 ± 2,351 cpm. Symbols are as in Fig. 1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of rnercuric acetate on DNA synthesis. Cells were exposed to various concentrations of mercuric acetate for 30 min and simultaneously pulsed with [3H]thymidine. DNA synthesis was determined as described in Materials and Methods. The values represent the average ± the standard deviation of at least two experiments.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Induction of SSBs in DNA by mercuric acetate. Alkaline elution analysis of DNA was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent the average of at least two experiments. A, 5 μM mercuric acetate; B, 10 μM mercuric acetate; C, 25 μM mercuric acetate; D, 50 μM mercuric acetate. For simplicity, the untreated controls ○ are shown only in A. Mercury (II) exposure was: ▲, 15 min; △, 30 min; □, 60 min; and ■, 90 min.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Concentration- and time-dependent formation of SSBs in DNA exposed to mercuric acetate. The SSF was determined from the alkaline elution profiles as described in Materials and Methods. A. Concentration-dependent formation of SSB. ●, 15 min; ▲, 30 min; ○, 60 min; △, 90 min. B. Time-dependent formation of SSB. ○, 5 μM; △, 10 μM;, ●, 25 μM; ▲, 50 μM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greunweld DW, Cruickshank MK. Effect of methylmercury (II) on the synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid and protein in HeLa S3 cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1979;28:661–656. - PubMed
    1. Chao E, Gierthy JF, Frenkel GD. A comparative study of the effects of mercury compounds on cell viability and nucleic acid synthesis in HeLa cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;33:1941–1945. - PubMed
    1. Costa M, Cantoni O, deMars M, Swartzendruber DE. Toxic metals produce an S-phase specific cell block. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1982;38:405–419. - PubMed
    1. Christie NT, Cantoni O, Sugiyama M, Cattabeni F, Costa M. Differences in the effects of Hg(II) on DNA repair induced in Chinese hamster ovary cells by ultraviolet or X-rays. Mol Pharmacol. 1986;29:173–178. - PubMed
    1. Robinson SH, Cantoni O, Costa M. Strand breakage and decreased molecular weight of DNA induced by specific metal compunds. Carcinogenesis. 1982;3:657–662. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources