The value of post-mortem computed tomography of burned victims in a forensic setting
- PMID: 30276675
- PMCID: PMC6420456
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5731-5
The value of post-mortem computed tomography of burned victims in a forensic setting
Abstract
Objectives: Fire deaths are challenging fatalities for forensic pathologists, as the main question of whether death was due to the fire or not needs to be answered. In this retrospective study, we assessed whether post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) has an added value prior to a forensic autopsy of burned victims.
Methods: From 2008 to 2016, a PMCT was performed in 50 burned corpses prior to a complete forensic autopsy. In retrospect, all 50 PMCT scans were systematically assessed by a forensically experienced radiologist, masked from the autopsy reports. Subsequently, the PMCT findings were compared with the autopsy reports.
Results: Heat fractures, contractions and destruction of extremities, subcutaneous emphysema and post-mortem gas collections were easier to detect by PMCT compared to autopsy. Alterations by penetrating and blunt trauma and the presence of foreign bodies were easy to detect by PMCT as well by autopsy. PMCT was, however, not successful in detecting signs of vitality during the fire, detection of superficial thermal injuries and to answer the main question of the forensic autopsy, which is to investigate the cause of death.
Conclusions: PMCT prior to autopsy is a valuable add-on in the post-mortem forensic investigation of burned victims for detection of hidden signs of trauma, gas collections and foreign bodies. However, since PMCT cannot answer the two main questions in forensic examination-determining the cause of death and detecting signs of vitality during the fire-it cannot replace an autopsy.
Key points: • Post-mortem CT (PMCT) in burned victims shows hidden signs of trauma. • Foreign bodies and gas collections can easily be detected. • Cause of death and vitality signs cannot be assessed by PMCT.
Keywords: Burns; Forensic medicine; Forensic pathology; Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor for this manuscript is Bernadette S. de Bakker, MD PhD.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because it concerned a retrospective study with anonymised data from deceased patients.
Ethical approval
Ethical Statement: The database contained anonymised patient data. Approval by a medical ethical committee for this anonymised retrospective investigation in deceased patients is not required to perform this type of study in The Netherlands.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in de Bakker et al [6]. This methodological paper describes how we incorporated all forensic cases into a database for further research. None of the cases used in the current manuscript have been previously described, mentioned or presented.
Methodology
• Retrospective
• Observational
• Performed at one institution
Figures






References
-
- Saukko PK, Knight B (2015) Knight's Forensic pathology, 4th edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton
-
- O'Donnell C, Iino M, Mansharan K, Leditscke J, Woodford N. Contribution of postmortem multidetector CT scanning to identification of the deceased in a mass disaster: Experience gained from the 2009 Victorian bushfires. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.05.026. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48:386–403. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical