Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Dec;45(6):1003-1011.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1011-y. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

Displaced distal radius fractures in children, cast alone vs additional K-wire fixation: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Displaced distal radius fractures in children, cast alone vs additional K-wire fixation: a meta-analysis

Alysia Sengab et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Displaced distal radius fractures in children are common and often treated by reduction and cast immobilization. Redisplacement occurs frequently and may be prevented by additional treatment with K-wire fixation after initial reduction. This meta-analysis aims to summarize available literature on this topic and determine if primary K-wire fixation is the preferred treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in children.

Methods: A search in eight databases identified studies that compared cast immobilization alone to additional K-wire fixation as treatment for displaced paediatric distal radius fractures. The primary outcome was the redisplacement rate. Secondary outcomes were secondary reduction rate, range of motion and complications. This meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement.

Results: Three RCTs and 3 cohort studies, analysing 197 patients treated with cast immobilization alone and 185 with additional K-wire fixation, were included in this meta-analysis. Redisplacement occurred less frequently after additional K-wire fixation than after cast alone (3.8 versus 45.7%; OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03-0.15). Secondary reduction was performed in 59.8% of the redisplaced fractures. Complications, other than redisplacement, occurred more often after additional K-wire fixation than after cast alone (15.7 versus 3.6%). Range of motion did not differ after both treatments.

Conclusions: Additional K-wire fixation is a suitable treatment to prevent redisplacement and secondary operations after initial reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in children, but is associated with post-procedural complications. Additional K-wire fixation does not result in a better range of motion than cast immobilization alone. More research is needed to identify those patients who will benefit the most from K-wire fixation as a treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in children.

Keywords: Cast immobilization; Complications; Distal radius; K-wire fixation; Outcome; Paediatric; Range of motion; Redisplacement; Reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Sengab, P. Krijnen. I. B. Schipper declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Redisplacement rate; additional K-wire fixation vs cast immobilization alone for a all patients with distal radius fractures patients, b patients with metaphyseal fractures, c patients with both-bone distal fractures, d patients with isolated distal radius fractures and e patients with completely displaced distal fractures
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Range of motion in degrees; Mean difference between additional K-wire fixation vs Cast immobilization alone for a flexion, b extension, c pronation, d supination, e radial deviation, f ulnar deviation

References

    1. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(1):15–22. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199302000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(6):656–660. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rennie L, et al. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007;38(8):913–922. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landin LA. Epidemiology of children’s fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6(2):79–83. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199704000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McQuinn AG, Jaarsma RL. Risk factors for redisplacement of pediatric distal forearm and distal radius fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):687–692. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b7525. - DOI - PubMed