Impact of body mass index on the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 30279268
- DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313490
Impact of body mass index on the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Objectives: The association between obesity and atrial fibrillation (AF) is well-established. We aimed to evaluate the impact of index body mass index (BMI) on AF recurrence at 12 months following catheter ablation using propensity-weighted analysis. In addition, periprocedural complications and fluoroscopy details were examined to assess overall safety in relationship to increasing BMI ranges.
Methods: Baseline, periprocedural and follow-up data were collected on consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation. There were no specific exclusion criteria. Patients were categorised according to baseline BMI in order to assess the outcomes for each category.
Results: Among 3333 patients, 728 (21.8%) were classified as normal (BMI <25.0 kg/m2), 1537 (46.1%) as overweight (BMI 25.5-29.0 kg/m2) and 1068 (32.0%) as obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). Procedural duration and radiation dose were higher for overweight and obese patients compared with those with a normal BMI (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). An index BMI ≥30 kg/m2 led to a 1.2-fold increased likelihood of experiencing recurrent AF at 12-months follow-up as compared with overweight patients (HR 1.223; 95% CI 1.047 to 1.429; p=0.011), while no significant correlation was found between overweight and normal BMI groups (HR 0.954; 95% CI 0.798 to 1.140; p=0.605) and obese versus normal BMI (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.965 to 1.412; p=0.112).
Conclusions: Patients with a baseline BMI ≥30 kg/m2 have a higher recurrence rate of AF following catheter ablation and therefore lifestyle modification to target obesity preprocedure should be considered in these patients.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; obesity.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: ENM reports consultant fees from Biosense Webster, speaker’s bureau: Biosense Webster, Boehringer Ingelheim and Medtronic; MK reports teaching contract with Johnson & Jonhnson and with Abbott (formerly St. Jude Medical); ND reports grants from Biotronik, Abbott (formerly St Jude Medical) and Boston Scientific to the institution outside the submitted work.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical