Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 3;19(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0229-x.

The difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using rapid maxillary expander (RME) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)-a finite element analysis

Affiliations

The difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using rapid maxillary expander (RME) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE)-a finite element analysis

Nathania Hartono et al. Prog Orthod. .

Abstract

Background: Maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) in combination with miniscrews was developed to overcome the drawbacks that may have resulted from the application of conventional rapid maxillary expander (RME). This research was conducted to analyze the difference of stress distribution of maxillary expansion using RME and MSE in the region of interests (ROIs): first molars (M1), palatal alveolar bones of M1, palatine sutures, zygomatic sutures, miniscrews, and their surrounding bones.

Methods: A dry skull was scanned using CBCT and rendered into a three-dimensional (3D) model of craniomaxillary structures. The data analysis was done both visually and numerically.

Result: The stress distributions in RME group were located at the palatal side of M1, mesial side of palatal alveolar of M1, pulp chamber of M1, and inferior cortex of palatine sutures. The stress distributions in the MSE group were located at the distopalatal cusp of M1, palatal side of palatal alveolar of M1, and inferior and superior cortex of palatine sutures. The stress distributions in zygomatic sutures on both groups were located at the zygomaticotemporal sutures, whereas in the miniscrews, the stress were located at the anterior miniscrews and palatal side of surrounding bones.

Conclusions: There were significant differences of stress distribution of maxillary expansion measured in the ROIs in the craniomaxillary 3D model using RME and MSE.

Keywords: Finite element analysis (FEA); Maxillary skeletal expander (MSE); Rapid palatal expander (RME); Stress distribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The von Mises stress distribution on the maxillary first molar in the expansion simulation using (a) RME, and (b) MSE
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The von Mises stress distribution on the palatal alveolar bone of upper first molar in the expansion simulation using (a) RME, and (b) MSE
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The von Mises stress distribution of the palatine suture in the expansion simulation using (a) RME, and (b) MSE
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The von Mises stress distribution of the zygomatic suture in the expansion simulation using (a) RME, and (b) MSE
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The stress distribution of the miniscrew in the expansion simulation using MSE
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The stress distribution of the palatal bone around miniscrew insertion site in the expansion simulation using MSE
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Frontal aspect of stress distribution as the resut of expansion of RME (a) and MSE (b)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Lateral aspect of stress distribution as the resut of expansion of RME (a) and MSE (b)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Occlusal aspect of stress distribution as the result of expansion of RME (a) and MSE (b)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Cortical bone thickness dissimilarity on palatum

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iseri H. Introduction. Semin Orthod. 2012;18(2):99. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2011.10.008. - DOI
    1. Mosleh MI, Kaddah MA, Abdou F, Elsayed A, Elsayed HS. Comparison of transverse changes during maxillary expansion with 4-point bone-borne and tooth-borne maxillary expanders. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148(4):599–607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assesed with cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Z, Hueni S, Tee BC, Kim H. Mechanical strain at alveolar bone and circummaxillary sutures during acute rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(3):e219–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JYK, Kim J, Taylor G, Linda L. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(4):428. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.052. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources