Survival and secondary interventions following treatment for locally-advanced prostate cancer
- PMID: 30281010
Survival and secondary interventions following treatment for locally-advanced prostate cancer
Abstract
Introduction: The utility of radical prostatectomy (RP) for locally-advanced prostate cancer remains unknown. Retrospective data has shown equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to radiation therapy (RT). RP may provide local tumor control and prevent secondary interventions from local invasion, and may decrease costs.
Materials and methods: Using SEER-Medicare data from 1995-2011 we identified men with locally-advanced prostate cancer undergoing RP or RT. Rates of post-treatment diagnoses and interventions were identified using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Skeletal related events (SRE), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) utilization, all-cause mortality, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and costs were compared.
Results: A total of 8367 men with locally-advanced prostate cancer were identified (6200 RP, 2167 RT). RT was associated with increased urinary obstruction, hematuria, infection, and cystoscopic intervention while RP was associated with increased urethral stricture intervention and erectile dysfunction. Compared to RT, RP was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (3.1 versus 5.2 deaths/100-person-years, p < 0.001), prostate cancer-specific mortality (0.8 versus 2.0 deaths/100-person-years, p < 0.001), SREs (2.0 versus 3.4 events/100 person-years, p < 0.001), and ADT utilization overall (7.4 versus 33.8 doses/100-person-years, p < 0.001) and > 3 years after treatment (3.6 versus 4.6 doses/100-person-years, p < 0.001). Overall and cancer specific costs were significantly lower for RP versus RT.
Conclusions: RT for locally-advanced prostate cancer has a higher incidence of mortality, secondary diagnoses and interventions, SRE, and ADT utilization compared to RP. This may lead to increased costs and have implications for quality of life. Our findings support the utility of RP in appropriately selected men with locally-advanced prostate cancer given the possible decreased morbidity and survival benefit.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer.Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4010-4022. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31726. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30252932 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of androgen-deprivation therapy and radiotherapy for older men with locally advanced prostate cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):716-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2743. Epub 2015 Jan 5. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25559808 Free PMC article.
-
Functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment: A comparison between single and multiple modalities.Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(2):104.e1-104.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Dec 17. Urol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36535862
-
Locally advanced prostate cancer: effective treatments, but many adverse effects.Prescrire Int. 2013 Jan;22(134):18-20, 22-3. Prescrire Int. 2013. PMID: 23367679 Review.
-
Is radical prostatectomy the "gold standard" for localized prostate cancer?Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct;33(5):511-5. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181b4af05. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20010078 Review.
Cited by
-
State of the science of sexual health among older cancer survivors: an integrative review.J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Aug;19(4):1184-1197. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01541-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13. J Cancer Surviv. 2025. PMID: 38349507 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical