Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 23;36(3):343-350.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy078.

Caring for veterans in US civilian primary care: qualitative interviews with primary care providers

Bonnie M Vest  1 , Jessica A Kulak  1 , Gregory G Homish  2
Affiliations

Caring for veterans in US civilian primary care: qualitative interviews with primary care providers

Bonnie M Vest et al. Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Non-VA health care providers in the USA have been called upon to screen patients for veteran status as a means to better identify military-related health sequelae. Despite this recognized need, many service members are still not being asked about veteran status.

Objective: The purpose of this research was to qualitatively assess, from non-VA primary care providers' point-of-view, barriers to providing care to veterans, the training providers perceive as most useful and the tools and translational processes they think would be most valuable in increasing military cultural competency.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews, with non-VA primary care providers (N = 10) as part of a larger quantitative study of primary care providers' attitudes around veteran care. Interviews asked about providers' approach to addressing veteran status in their practice and their thoughts on how to address the needs of this population. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach.

Results: Three major themes were identified: (i) barriers to caring for patients who are identified as veterans, (ii) thoughts on tools that might help better identify and screen veteran patients and (iii) thoughts on translating and implementing new care processes for veteran patients into everyday practice.

Conclusions: Our study identified barriers related to non-VA providers' ability to care for veterans among their patients and possible mechanisms for improving recognition of veterans in civilian health care settings. There is a need for further research to understand how assessment, screening and follow up care for veteran patients is best implemented into civilian primary care settings.

Keywords: Health services research; implementation science; primary care; provider education; qualitative research; veterans.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS. Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. JAMA 2006; 295: 1023–32. - PubMed
    1. Hunt EJ, Wessely S, Jones N, Rona RJ, Greenberg N. The mental health of the UK Armed Forces: where facts meet fiction. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2014; 5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.23617 - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGuire A, Dobson A, Mewton L et al. . Mental health service use: comparing people who served in the military or received veterans’ affairs benefits and the general population. Aust N Z J Public Health 2015; 39: 524–9. - PubMed
    1. Milliken CS, Auchterlonie JL, Hoge CW. Longitudinal assessment of mental health problems among active and reserve component soldiers returning from the Iraq war. JAMA 2007; 298: 2141–8. - PubMed
    1. Vermetten E, Greenberg N, Boeschoten MA et al. . Deployment-related mental health support: comparative analysis of NATO and allied ISAF partners. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2014; 5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.23732 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types