Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany
- PMID: 30282684
- PMCID: PMC6169760
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694
Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Introduction: Affective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.
Methods and analyses: We will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.
Keywords: affect regulation; ambulatory assessment; borderline personality disorder; cognitive control; discarding; interference control; major depression.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Affective and cognitive theory of mind abilities in youth with borderline personality disorder or major depressive disorder.Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 23. Psychiatry Res. 2017. PMID: 28667928
-
Affective and cognitive theory of mind in borderline personality disorder: The role of comorbid depression.Psychiatry Res. 2017 Nov;257:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.034. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Psychiatry Res. 2017. PMID: 28755605
-
Neural Correlates of Affective Disturbances: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Negative Affect Processing in Borderline Personality Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Mar;4(3):220-232. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 16. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019. PMID: 30581154
-
Depression in patients with borderline personality disorder.Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):266-73. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000045. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25188732 Review.
-
Effects of cortisol on cognition in major depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder - 2014 Curt Richter Award Winner.Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:282-95. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 18. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015. PMID: 25462901 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive control of negative stimuli in borderline personality disorder.Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 23;9(1):332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37315-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30674987 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Increases in negative affective arousal precede lower self-esteem in patients with borderline personality disorder but not in patients with depressive disorders: an experience sampling approach.Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Oct 3;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00229-w. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023. PMID: 37784203 Free PMC article.
-
Digital assessment of working memory and processing speed in everyday life: Feasibility, validation, and lessons-learned.Internet Interv. 2019 Dec 30;19:100300. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100300. eCollection 2020 Mar. Internet Interv. 2019. PMID: 31970080 Free PMC article.
-
Screening accuracy of a 14-day smartphone ambulatory assessment of depression symptoms and mood dynamics in a general population sample: Comparison with the PHQ-9 depression screening.PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244955. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33406120 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Ball-in-Bowl Metaphor to Outline an Integrative Framework for Understanding Dysregulated Emotion.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 9;12:626698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626698. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34434124 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Linehan MM, Bohus M, Lynch TR. Dialectical behavior therapy for pervasive emotion dysregulation: theoretical and practical underpinnings Gross JJ, Handbook of emotion regulation. New York, NY US: Guilford Press, 2007:581–605.
-
- Joormann J, D’Avanzato C. Emotion regulation in depression: examining the role of cognitive processes. Cognition and Emotion 2010;24:913–39.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources