Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018)
- PMID: 30284892
- DOI: 10.1037/amp0000370
Intent of reporting standards: Reply to Rossiter (2018)
Abstract
In this reply to Rossiter (2018), we note that the goal of developing Journal Article Reporting Standards has been to specify the kinds of information that should be provided to the readers of scientific articles in order to allow maximal understanding of the work being reported-in the case of psychometrics, information that demonstrates the underlying adequacy of the measures used in the research being reported. Although we illustrate some kinds of items that might be utilized to make these demonstrations, the illustrations are not proscriptive. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Comment on
-
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/amp0000191. Am Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29345484
-
The new psychometrics: Comment on Appelbaum et al. (2018).Am Psychol. 2018 Oct;73(7):930-931. doi: 10.1037/amp0000342. Am Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30284891
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources