Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 5;17(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0843-8.

Government resource contributions to the private-not-for-profit sector in Uganda: evolution, adaptations and implications for universal health coverage

Affiliations

Government resource contributions to the private-not-for-profit sector in Uganda: evolution, adaptations and implications for universal health coverage

Aloysius Ssennyonjo et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: A case study was prepared examining government resource contributions (GRCs) to private-not-for-profit (PNFP) providers in Uganda. It focuses on Primary Health Care (PHC) grants to the largest non-profit provider network, the Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau (UCMB), from 1997 to 2015. The framework of complex adaptive systems was used to explain changes in resource contributions and the relationship between the Government and UCMB.

Methods: Documents and key informant interviews with the important actors provided the main sources of qualitative data. Trends for GRCs and service outputs for the study period were constructed from existing databases used to monitor service inputs and outputs. The case study's findings were validated during two meetings with a broad set of stakeholders.

Results: Three major phases were identified in the evolution of GRCs and the relationship between the Government and UCMB: 1) Initiation, 2) Rapid increase in GRCs, and 3) Declining GRCs. The main factors affecting the relationship's evolution were: 1) Financial deficits at PNFP facilities, 2) advocacy by PNFP network leaders, 3) changes in the government financial resource envelope, 4) variations in the "good will" of government actors, and 5) changes in donor funding modalities. Responses to the above dynamics included changes in user fees, operational costs of PNFPs, and government expectations of UCMB. Quantitative findings showed a progressive increase in service outputs despite the declining value of GRCs during the study period.

Conclusions: GRCs in Uganda have evolved influenced by various factors and the complex interactions between government and PNFPs. The Universal Health Coverage (UHC) agenda should pay attention to these factors and their interactions when shaping how governments work with PNFPs to advance UHC. GRCs could be leveraged to mitigate the financial burden on communities served by PNFPs. Governments seeking to advance UHC goals should explore policies to expand GRCs and other modalities to subsidize the operational costs of PNFPs.

Keywords: Complex adaptive systems; Government subsidies; Non-state providers; Primary health care; Private-not-for-profit; Uganda; Universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was granted by Makerere University School of Public Health, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology and WHO Ethics Research Committee. Consent was sought and granted by all study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AS, FS, JN, and SB declare that no competing interests. SO and RK are the senior managers of the Uganda Catholic Medical Bureau.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trend for Total Govt. Health budget and percent share of government resources going to PNFPs over the years
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PHC Grant disbursements to UCMB network in absolute terms and values adjusted for inflation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trends in deliveries and OPD utilization in the UCMB network-1997 0 2015
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Causal Loop diagram for ‘initiation phase’ of PHC grant
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Causal Loop diagram for phase of ‘marked increase’ of in PHC grants and the adaptions by government and UCMB
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Causal loop diagram for ‘decline phase’ of PHC grants

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evans TG, Palu T. Setting priorities, building prosperity through universal health coverage. Heal Syst Reform. 2016;2(1):21–22. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1125265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Assembly. Strengthening essential public health functions in support of the achievement of universal health coverage. Resolution WHA69.1; World Health Assembly, United Nations Geneva, Switzerland 2016.
    1. MOH . Systems H, 20/20;, School MU, Public. Uganda Health System Assessment 2011. Health systems 20/20 project, Abt associates Inc. 2012.
    1. Pariyo GW, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Okui O, Rahman M, Peterson S, Bishai DM, et al. Changes in utilization of health services among poor and rural residents in Uganda: are reforms benefitting the poor? Int J Equity Health. 2009;8(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-39. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MoH . National Health Policy II. 2010.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources