Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;43(10):903-912.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.021.

Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends

Hoyune E Cho  1 , Lin Zhong  1 , Sandra V Kotsis  1 , Kevin C Chung  2
Affiliations

Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends

Hoyune E Cho et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Traumatic digit amputations have an adverse impact on patients' daily living. Despite experts advocating for digit replantation, studies have shown a continued decrease in rate of replantation. We performed a national-level investigation to examine the recent trend of practice for digital replantation.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to select adult patients with traumatic digit amputation from 2001 to 2014. We calculated the rate of attempted and rate of successful digit replantation per year, subcategorizing for digit type (thumb or finger) and for hospital type (rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching). We also analyzed the pattern of distribution of case volume to each hospital type per year. We used 2 multivariable logistic regression models to investigate patient demographic and hospital characteristics associated with the odds of replantation attempt and success.

Results: Among the 14,872 adult patients with a single digit amputation from 2001 to 2014, only 1,670 (11.2%) underwent replantation. The rate of replantation attempt trended down over the years for both thumb and finger injuries at all hospital types, despite increasing proportions of cases being sent to urban teaching hospitals where they were more than twice as likely to undergo replantation. The rate of successful replantation stayed stable for the thumb at 82.9% and increased for fingers from 76.1% to 82.4% over the years. Patients were more likely to undergo replantation if they had private insurance or a higher level of income. Neither hospital case volume nor hospital type was predictive of successful replantation.

Conclusions: Although more single-digit amputations were treated by urban teaching hospitals with higher likelihood to replant, the downward trend in rate of attempt regardless of hospital type demonstrates that concentration of case volume is not the solution to reverse the declining trend.

Clinical relevance: Financial aspects of digit replantation need to be considered from both the patients' and the surgeons' perspectives to improve delivery of care for digit replantation.

Keywords: Digit replantation; health policy; national trend; resource allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1a.
Figure 1a.
Rate of Replantation Attempt (2001 – 2014) by Digit Type 1b. Rate of Replantation Attempt (2001 – 2014) by Hospital Type
Figure 1a.
Figure 1a.
Rate of Replantation Attempt (2001 – 2014) by Digit Type 1b. Rate of Replantation Attempt (2001 – 2014) by Hospital Type
Figure 2a.
Figure 2a.
Rate of Successful Replantation (2001 – 2014) by Digit Type 2b. Rate of Successful Replantation (2001 – 2014) by Hospital Type
Figure 2a.
Figure 2a.
Rate of Successful Replantation (2001 – 2014) by Digit Type 2b. Rate of Successful Replantation (2001 – 2014) by Hospital Type
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Case Distribution per Hospital Type (2001 – 2014)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rui P, Kang K. CDC National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2015 Emergency Department Summary Tables.https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web tables/2015 ed web tables.pdf. Accessed July 18th, 2018
    1. Bastidas N, Cassidy L, Hoffman L, Sharma S. A single-institution experience of hand surgery litigation in a major replantation center. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(1):284–292. - PubMed
    1. de Putter CE, Selles RW, Polinder S, Panneman MJ, Hovius SE, van Beeck EF. Economic impact of hand and wrist injuries: health-care costs and productivity costs in a population-based study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94(9):e56. - PubMed
    1. Waikakul S, Vanadurongwan V, Unnanuntana A. Prognostic factors for major limb re-implantation at both immediate and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80(6): 1024–1030. - PubMed
    1. Tessler O, Bartow MJ, Tremblay-Champagne MP, et al. Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Digital Replantation versus Revision Amputation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33(6): 446–451. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms