Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas
- PMID: 30287246
- PMCID: PMC6289663
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.006
Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas
Abstract
Objectives: To compare pregnancy options counseling and referral practices at state- and Title X-funded family planning organizations in Texas after enforcement of a policy restricting abortion referrals for providers participating in state-funded programs, which differed from Title X guidelines to provide referrals for services upon request.
Study design: Between November 2014 and February 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews with administrators at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas about how they integrated primary care and family planning services, including pregnancy options counseling and referrals for unplanned pregnancies. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts related to organizations' pregnancy options counseling and referral practices, and compared themes across organizations that did and did not receive Title X funding.
Results: Of the 37 organizations with transcript segments on options counseling and referrals, 15 received Title X and 22 relied on state funding only. All Title X-funded organizations but only nine state-funded organizations reported offering pregnancy options counseling. Respondents at state-only-funded organizations often described directing pregnant women exclusively to prenatal care. Regardless of funding source, most organizations provided women a list of agencies offering abortion, adoption and prenatal care. However, some respondents expressed concern that providing other information about abortion would threaten their state funding. In contrast, respondents indicated staff would make appointments for prenatal care, assist with Medicaid applications and, in some instances, directly connect women with adoption-related services.
Conclusions: Pregnancy options counseling varied by organizations' funding guidelines. Additionally, abortion referrals were less common than referrals for other pregnancy-related care.
Implications: Programmatic guidelines restricting information on abortion counseling and referrals may adversely affect care for pregnant women at publicly funded family planning organizations.
Keywords: Abortion referrals; Policy; Texas; Title X.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Availability of Confidential Services for Teens Declined After the 2011-2013 Changes to Publicly Funded Family Planning Programs in Texas.J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 20. J Adolesc Health. 2020. PMID: 31974014 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in Pregnancy Options Counseling and Referrals, And Reported Proximity to Abortion Services, Among Publicly Funded Family Planning Facilities.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Jun;48(2):65-71. doi: 10.1363/48e8816. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016. PMID: 27116392
-
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8886761
-
Pregnancy testing and counseling.Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;36(3):681-96. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36691-3. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989. PMID: 2660091 Review.
-
Abortion referral-making in the United States: findings and recommendations from the abortion referrals learning community.Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.141. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 31376380 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors related to pregnancy status and unwanted pregnancy among lebanese women during the COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional study.Arch Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;80(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00833-2. Arch Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35216618 Free PMC article.
-
The economics of abortion and its links with stigma: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on the economics of abortion.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 18;16(2):e0246238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246238. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33600471 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):1498. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08889-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36482413 Free PMC article.
-
Availability of Confidential Services for Teens Declined After the 2011-2013 Changes to Publicly Funded Family Planning Programs in Texas.J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 20. J Adolesc Health. 2020. PMID: 31974014 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Statutes and regulations: Title X notice of proposed rulemaking, 2018. https://www.hhs.gov/opa/title-x-family-planning/about-title-x-grants/sta... (accessed June 17, 2018).
-
- Fowler Cl, Gable J, Wang J, Lasater B. Family Planning Annual Report: 2016 national summary. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International: 2017. https://www.hhs.gov/opa/sites/default/files/title-x-fpar-2016-national.pdf (accessed June 24, 2018).
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion no 385: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2007. - PubMed
-
- Hornberger LL AAP Committee on Adolescence. Options counseling for the pregnant adolescent patient. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20172274. - PubMed
-
- Moss DA, Snyder MJ, Lin L. Options for women with unintended pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2015;91:544–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical