Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas
- PMID: 30287246
- PMCID: PMC6289663
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.006
Counseling and referrals for women with unplanned pregnancies at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas
Abstract
Objectives: To compare pregnancy options counseling and referral practices at state- and Title X-funded family planning organizations in Texas after enforcement of a policy restricting abortion referrals for providers participating in state-funded programs, which differed from Title X guidelines to provide referrals for services upon request.
Study design: Between November 2014 and February 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews with administrators at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas about how they integrated primary care and family planning services, including pregnancy options counseling and referrals for unplanned pregnancies. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts related to organizations' pregnancy options counseling and referral practices, and compared themes across organizations that did and did not receive Title X funding.
Results: Of the 37 organizations with transcript segments on options counseling and referrals, 15 received Title X and 22 relied on state funding only. All Title X-funded organizations but only nine state-funded organizations reported offering pregnancy options counseling. Respondents at state-only-funded organizations often described directing pregnant women exclusively to prenatal care. Regardless of funding source, most organizations provided women a list of agencies offering abortion, adoption and prenatal care. However, some respondents expressed concern that providing other information about abortion would threaten their state funding. In contrast, respondents indicated staff would make appointments for prenatal care, assist with Medicaid applications and, in some instances, directly connect women with adoption-related services.
Conclusions: Pregnancy options counseling varied by organizations' funding guidelines. Additionally, abortion referrals were less common than referrals for other pregnancy-related care.
Implications: Programmatic guidelines restricting information on abortion counseling and referrals may adversely affect care for pregnant women at publicly funded family planning organizations.
Keywords: Abortion referrals; Policy; Texas; Title X.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs. Statutes and regulations: Title X notice of proposed rulemaking, 2018. https://www.hhs.gov/opa/title-x-family-planning/about-title-x-grants/sta... (accessed June 17, 2018).
-
- Fowler Cl, Gable J, Wang J, Lasater B. Family Planning Annual Report: 2016 national summary. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International: 2017. https://www.hhs.gov/opa/sites/default/files/title-x-fpar-2016-national.pdf (accessed June 24, 2018).
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion no 385: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2007. - PubMed
-
- Hornberger LL AAP Committee on Adolescence. Options counseling for the pregnant adolescent patient. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20172274. - PubMed
-
- Moss DA, Snyder MJ, Lin L. Options for women with unintended pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2015;91:544–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
