Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 26:12:1937-1945.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S175045. eCollection 2018.

Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations

Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes

Florian M Karl et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Background: Patient self-management is crucial to prevent complications and mortality in type 2 diabetes. From an economic perspective, time preference predicts short-sighted decision making and thus might help to explain non-adherence to self-anagement recommendations. However, recent studies on this association have shown mixed results.

Purpose: In this study, we tested whether the combination of time preference and outcome expectancy can improve the predictions of self-management behavior.

Patients and methods: Data from 665 patients with type 2 diabetes were obtained from the cross-sectional KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) GEFU 4 study. Time preference and outcome expectancy were measured by one question each, which were answered on a 4-point Likert scale. Their association with six self-managing behaviors was tested in logistic and linear regression analyses. Likewise, we examined the association between self-management and the interaction of outcome expectancy and time preference.

Results: A high time preference was associated with a significantly lower sum of self-management behaviors (β=-0.29, 95% CI [-0.54, -0.04]). Higher outcome expectancy was associated with a higher self-management score (β=0.21, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.45]). The interaction model showed that low time preference was only associated with better self-management when combined with a high outcome expectancy (β=0.05, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.39] vs β=0.27, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.63]).

Conclusion: Time preference and outcome expectancy are interrelated predictors of patient self-management and could be used to identify and to intervene on patients with a potentially poor self-management.

Keywords: adherence; behavioral economics; health behavior; temporal discounting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes Association, American Diabetes Association, Association AD. 5 Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S51–S54. - PubMed
    1. Laxy M, Mielck A, Hunger M, et al. The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1604–1612. - PubMed
    1. Ulrich S, Holle R, Wacker M, et al. Cost burden of type 2 diabetes in Germany: results from the population-based KORA studies. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012527. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mielck A, Vogelmann M, Leidl R. Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Educator. 2017;43(1):40–53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources