Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes
- PMID: 30288034
- PMCID: PMC6163016
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S175045
Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Background: Patient self-management is crucial to prevent complications and mortality in type 2 diabetes. From an economic perspective, time preference predicts short-sighted decision making and thus might help to explain non-adherence to self-anagement recommendations. However, recent studies on this association have shown mixed results.
Purpose: In this study, we tested whether the combination of time preference and outcome expectancy can improve the predictions of self-management behavior.
Patients and methods: Data from 665 patients with type 2 diabetes were obtained from the cross-sectional KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) GEFU 4 study. Time preference and outcome expectancy were measured by one question each, which were answered on a 4-point Likert scale. Their association with six self-managing behaviors was tested in logistic and linear regression analyses. Likewise, we examined the association between self-management and the interaction of outcome expectancy and time preference.
Results: A high time preference was associated with a significantly lower sum of self-management behaviors (β=-0.29, 95% CI [-0.54, -0.04]). Higher outcome expectancy was associated with a higher self-management score (β=0.21, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.45]). The interaction model showed that low time preference was only associated with better self-management when combined with a high outcome expectancy (β=0.05, 95% CI [-0.28, 0.39] vs β=0.27, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.63]).
Conclusion: Time preference and outcome expectancy are interrelated predictors of patient self-management and could be used to identify and to intervene on patients with a potentially poor self-management.
Keywords: adherence; behavioral economics; health behavior; temporal discounting.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Association between unrealistic comparative optimism and self-management in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from a cross-sectional, population-based study.Health Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;3(2):e157. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.157. eCollection 2020 Jun. Health Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32377577 Free PMC article.
-
The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study.Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1604-12. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2533. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Diabetes Care. 2014. PMID: 24667462
-
The influence of value reference point and risk preference on adherence in hypertensive patients in a low-income area of China.Postgrad Med. 2020 Mar;132(2):132-140. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1702849. Epub 2020 Jan 3. Postgrad Med. 2020. PMID: 31900018
-
[Patients' preferences in the medicamentous treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2: A systematic classification and meta-comparison of patient preference studies].Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Apr;58(4-5):452-66. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2127-4. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015. PMID: 25687713 Review. German.
-
Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(5):321-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422050-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15061682 Review.
Cited by
-
Intertemporal decision-making as a mediator between personality traits and self-management in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1210691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1210691. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37575446 Free PMC article.
-
How time and risk preferences affect glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 21;15(1):30740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16791-y. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40841753
-
Relationship Between Delay Discounting and Clinical Diabetes Outcomes: A Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):3052-3063. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08981-7. Epub 2024 Aug 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39150678
-
How is Patient Adherence Possible? A Novel Mechanistic Model of Adherence Based on Humanities.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jul 18;17:1705-1720. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S419277. eCollection 2023. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023. PMID: 37484740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Irrational Responses to Risk Preference Questionnaires by Patients with Diabetes with or without Retinopathy and Comparison with Those without Diabetes.Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Dec 14;13:4961-4971. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S283591. eCollection 2020. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020. PMID: 33376369 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Diabetes Association, American Diabetes Association, Association AD. 5 Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S51–S54. - PubMed
-
- Laxy M, Mielck A, Hunger M, et al. The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1604–1612. - PubMed
-
- Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Educator. 2017;43(1):40–53. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources