Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 20:11:1921-1926.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S174490. eCollection 2018.

Hypnosis intervention for the management of pain perception during cataract surgery

Xiaofan Chen  1 , Rongdi Yuan  1 , Xiao Chen  2 , Min Sun  2 , Sen Lin  2 , Jian Ye  2 , Chunlin Chen  2
Affiliations

Hypnosis intervention for the management of pain perception during cataract surgery

Xiaofan Chen et al. J Pain Res. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of hypnosis in pain management during cataract surgery.

Methods: Male or female patients with bilateral age-related cataract who wished to have both eyes subjected to phacoemulsification surgery were preliminarily admitted. Immediately after the first-eye surgery, each patient was evaluated for pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and patients with a VAS score >1 were enrolled. By using block randomization, the enrolled patients were allocated to either the treatment group, which received a hypnosis intervention before the scheduled second-eye surgery, or the control group, which did not undergo hypnosis. The levels of anxiety, pain, and cooperation were evaluated independently by the patients and the surgeon.

Results: During the intraoperative pain assessment, 5%, 34%, 38%, and 23% of patients in the control group reported experiencing no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain, respectively. In contrast, in the hypnosis group, 18%, 56%, 15%, and 11% of patients reported experiencing no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, and severe pain, respectively, which showed significant differences between the groups (P<0.005). The evaluation of anxiety level showed that the mean score in the control group and hypnosis group was 11.77±0.32 and 6.64±0.21, respectively, revealing a highly significant difference between the two groups (P<0.005). The assessment of patient cooperation showed that only 5% and 18% of patients in the control group and 18% and 36% of patients in the hypnosis group showed excellent and good cooperation, respectively, while 47% of patients in the control group and only 24% of patients in the hypnosis group exhibited poor cooperation, revealing significant differences between the groups (P<0.005).

Conclusion: Hypnosis may be considered as an auxiliary measure in cataract surgery, especially for patients who experienced obvious pain during the first-eye surgery.

Keywords: cataract surgery; hypnosis; pain; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pain score chart. 0, no pain; 1–3, mild pain; 4–6, moderate pain; 7–9, severe pain; 10, unbearable pain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flow chart. Abbreviation: VAS, visual analog scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Extent of patient pain with or without hypnosis. Abbreviation: VAS, visual analog scale.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Anxiety levels in patients with or without hypnosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cooperation levels in patients with or without hypnosis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ezra DG, Allan BD. Topical anaesthesia alone versus topical anaesthesia with intracameral lidocaine for phacoemulsification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18(3):CD005276. - PubMed
    1. Nanji KC, Roberto SA, Morley MG, Bayes J. Preventing Adverse Events in Cataract Surgery: Recommendations From a Massachusetts Expert Panel. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1537–1547. - PubMed
    1. Hosoda Y, Kuriyama S, Jingami Y, Hattori H, Hayashi H, Matsumoto M. A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1139–1144. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ezra DG, Nambiar A, Allan BD. Supplementary intracameral lidocaine for phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):455–487. - PubMed
    1. Dadaı Z, Borazan M, Öncel Acır N. Pain Perception in Phacoemulsification with Topical Anesthesia and Evaluation of Factors Related with Pain. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46(4):151–155. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources