Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct;97(40):e11566.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011566.

Worldwide research productivity in the field of back pain: A bibliometric analysis

Bin Wang  1 , Peng Zhao
Affiliations
Review

Worldwide research productivity in the field of back pain: A bibliometric analysis

Bin Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to show the world research productivity in the field of back pain and to help researchers follow the scientific development and promote the cooperation in this field.

Methods: Web of Science (WoS) database was searched from 1995 to 2016 without other restrictions. The keywords were as follows: "lumbar NEAR pain," "back pain," "dorsalgia," "backache," "lumbago," "back NEAR disorder," and "discitis." The following information of retrieved articles was analyzed: countries/territories, journals, publication year, authors, citation reports, and institutions. Publication activity was further adjusted for countries by gross domestic product (GDP) and population size.

Results: A total of 50,970 articles were retrieved in WoS database from 1995 to 2016. The United States published the biggest number of articles (16,818, 33.00%), followed by England (4,582, 8.99%), Germany (3,871, 7.60%), Canada (3,613, 7.09%), and Australia (3,063, 6.01%). Sweden ranked the first after adjusted for publication, and Netherlands ranked the first after adjusted for GDP. Besides, there was positive correlation between total number of publications and GDP for each country (P < .05). Harvard University was the most productive institution (917, 1.80%), Maher CG was the most productive author (229, 0.45%) and Spine was the most popular journal (3605, 7.07%) in the field of back pain research. Moreover, the article titled "Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale" in Pain had the highest citations (1749).

Conclusion: There was a significant increase in annual publications concerning back pain research worldwide. The total number of publications was positively associated with GDP in main productive countries. The United States was the most productive country, Harvard University was the most productive institution, Maher CG was the most productive author and Spine was the most popular journal in the field of back pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
World-map distributions of publications concerning back pain from 1995 to 2016.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Publications concerning back pain from 1995 to 2016.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 1988;318:291–300. - PubMed
    1. Lurie JD, Gerber PD, Sox HC. Clinical problem-solving. A pain in the back. N Engl J Med 2000;343:723–6. - PubMed
    1. Buchbinder R, Blyth FM, March LM, et al. Placing the global burden of low back pain in context. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2013;27:575–89. - PubMed
    1. Aufranc OE, Barr JS, Brown T, et al. Orthopedic surgery. N Engl J Med 1957;256:1040–50. - PubMed
    1. Beeckmans N, Vermeersch A, Lysens R, et al. The presence of respiratory disorders in individuals with low back pain: A systematic review. Man Ther 2016;26:77–86. - PubMed