Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 20:9:1690.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01690. eCollection 2018.

Perpetuating Inequality: Junior Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless Negatively Affected by It

Naomi Sterk  1 , Loes Meeussen  1   2 , Colette Van Laar  1
Affiliations

Perpetuating Inequality: Junior Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless Negatively Affected by It

Naomi Sterk et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Previous research has revealed that women may attempt to avoid negative gender stereotypes in organizations through self-group distancing, or "queen bee", behaviors: emphasizing masculine qualities, distancing themselves from other women, and legitimizing organizational inequality. Factors that increase self-group distancing have been identified (e.g., existing discrimination and low group identification), but it is unknown how self-group distancing by an ingroup leader is perceived by and affects subordinates of the negatively stereotyped group. In the current study, female participants received ambiguous negative feedback from a male versus female leader displaying queen bee-type versus neutral behavior. As expected, a male leader displaying queen bee-type behavior was seen as having less positive intent than a male leader displaying neutral behavior, which in turn increased how sexist he was perceived to be. A female leader displaying queen bee (vs. neutral) behavior was not seen as having less positive intent, which thus did not indirectly influence perceived sexism. Behavior of both male and female leaders did affect junior women: participants exposed to a leader displaying queen bee-type behavior reported more anger, sadness, and anxiety than participants exposed to a leader displaying neutral behavior. These data provide further evidence that simply adding more women or minorities in key senior positions is insufficient to change inequality if bias in the organization is not tackled. Specifically, exposure to gender inequality can steer female leaders to endorse-rather than change-stereotypes about women, and this behavior is particularly consequential because it (a) might not be recognized as bias and (b) exerts negative effects.

Keywords: ambiguity; bias; negative affect; queen bee effects; self-group distancing; sexism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mediation model for male leader showing effects of QB-type behavior on increased perceived sexism through reduced perceptions of positive intent (partially standardized regression coefficients, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Simple slopes showing anxiety as a function of leader behavior (QB[-type] vs. control) and gender identification (–1 SD, +1 SD) in the male leader and in the female leader condition.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bagues M., Sylos-Labini M., Zinovyeva N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter? Am. Econ. Rev. 107 1207–1238. 10.1257/aer.20151211 - DOI
    1. Baron R. S., Burgess M. L., Kao C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: do female perpetrators go undetected? Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17 115–123. 10.1177/014616729101700201 - DOI
    1. Barreto M., Ellemers N. (2005). The perils of political correctness: men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Soc. Psychol. Q. 68 75–88. 10.1177/019027250506800106 - DOI
    1. Barreto M., Ellemers N., Scholten W., Smith H. (2010). To be or not to be: the impact of implicit versus explicit categorizations on the self. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 49 43–67. 10.1348/014466608X400830 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Branscombe N. R., Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. (1999a). “The context and content of social identity threat,” in Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, eds Ellemers N., Spears R., Doosje B. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; ), 35–58.