Experimental comparative study of thrombogenicity of two differently luminal heparinized ePTFE vascular prosthetics
- PMID: 30294434
- PMCID: PMC6170203
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.037
Experimental comparative study of thrombogenicity of two differently luminal heparinized ePTFE vascular prosthetics
Abstract
Introduction: ; Heparin bonded grafts have proven to improve patency, at least transiently.Two different heparin bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts produced by different technologies are currently available.This pilot primary goal was to test these commonly used, but differently heparinized ePTFE grafts for differences in primary patency after a 6-months follow-up in a sheep model. Secondly, the aim was to establish a large animal model to enable future translational studies and further graft development.
Method: ; End-to-side bypass of the common carotid artery was performed bilaterally in sheep. Either a Gore® Propaten heparinized graft or a Jotec® Flowline Bipore heparinized graft was used, both 5 mm in diameter.Following graft implantation, the sheep were kept on pasture for 6 months, with monthly duplex scans to determine patency. At termination, the grafts were duplex scanned a final time, with the animals sedated, and the grafts were removed for heparin activity analysis.
Results: ; 14 sheep were operated, 11 survived total follow-up time. At final follow-up, 4 patent Gore® grafts, and 6 Jotec® remained. Mean patency time was 106.7 ± 21.9(SD) days and 96.2 ± 25.9(SD) days for Gore® and Jotec®, respectively. Log-rank test showed no significant difference at final follow-up after 6 months. Post mortem heparin analysis showed no significant difference in mean activity.
Conclusion: ; Based on patency data alone, no significant difference between these grafts were found. In accordance, heparin activity analysis showed no difference between the grafts. The model itself, proved easily implementable, and provides many possibilities for future studies, though some adjustments should be made to improve survival.
Figures
References
-
- Daenens K., Schepers S., Fourneau I., Houthoofd S., Nevelsteen A. Heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts compared with vein grafts in femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypasses: 1- and 2-year results. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009;49(5):1210–1216. - PubMed
-
- Heyligers J.M., Verhagen H.J., Rotmans J.I., Weeterings C., de Groot P.G., Moll F.L. Heparin immobilization reduces thrombogenicity of small-caliber expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006;43(3):587–591. - PubMed
-
- Lammer J., Zeller T., Hausegger K.A., Schaefer P.J., Gschwendtner M., Mueller-Huelsbeck S. Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1320–1327. - PubMed
-
- Peeters P., Verbist J., Deloose K., Bosiers M. Results with heparin bonded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femorodistal bypasses. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006;47(4):407–413. - PubMed
-
- Pulli R., Dorigo W., Castelli P., Dorrucci V., Ferilli F., De Blasis G. Midterm results from a multicenter registry on the treatment of infrainguinal critical limb ischemia using a heparin-bonded ePTFE graft. J. Vasc. Surg. 2010;51(5) 1167-11677 e1. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
