A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes
- PMID: 30295512
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774518803635
A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes
Abstract
Background/aims: Cluster randomized trials are popular in health-related research due to the need or desire to randomize clusters of subjects to different trial arms as opposed to randomizing each subject individually. As outcomes from subjects within the same cluster tend to be more alike than outcomes from subjects within other clusters, an exchangeable correlation arises that is measured via the intra-cluster correlation coefficient. Intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimation is especially important due to the increasing awareness of the need to publish such values from studies in order to help guide the design of future cluster randomized trials. Therefore, numerous methods have been proposed to accurately estimate the intra-cluster correlation coefficient, with much attention given to binary outcomes. As marginal models are often of interest, we focus on intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimation in the context of fitting such a model with binary outcomes using generalized estimating equations. Traditionally, intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimation with generalized estimating equations has been based on the method of moments, although such estimators can be negatively biased. Furthermore, alternative estimators that work well, such as the analysis of variance estimator, are not as readily applicable in the context of practical data analyses with generalized estimating equations. Therefore, in this article we assess, in terms of bias, the readily available residual pseudo-likelihood approach to intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimation with the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Furthermore, we study a possible corresponding approach to confidence interval construction for the intra-cluster correlation coefficient.
Methods: We utilize a simulation study and application example to assess bias in intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimates obtained from GLIMMIX using residual pseudo-likelihood. This estimator is contrasted with method of moments and analysis of variance estimators which are standards of comparison. The approach to confidence interval construction is assessed by examining coverage probabilities.
Results: Overall, the residual pseudo-likelihood estimator performs very well. It has considerably less bias than moment estimators, which are its competitor for general generalized estimating equation-based analyses, and therefore, it is a major improvement in practice. Furthermore, it works almost as well as analysis of variance estimators when they are applicable. Confidence intervals have near-nominal coverage when the intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimate has negligible bias.
Conclusion: Our results show that the residual pseudo-likelihood estimator is a good option for intra-cluster correlation coefficient estimation when conducting a generalized estimating equation-based analysis of binary outcome data arising from cluster randomized trials. The estimator is practical in that it is simply a result from fitting a marginal model with GLIMMIX, and a confidence interval can be easily obtained. An additional advantage is that, unlike most other options for performing generalized estimating equation-based analyses, GLIMMIX provides analysts the option to utilize small-sample adjustments that ensure valid inference.
Keywords: Empirical covariance matrix; generalized estimating equations; group randomized trial; method of moments; residual pseudo-likelihood; small-sample corrections.
Similar articles
-
GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Mar;230:107362. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107362. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023. PMID: 36709555 Free PMC article.
-
Marginal modeling in community randomized trials with rare events: Utilization of the negative binomial regression model.Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;19(2):162-171. doi: 10.1177/17407745211063479. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 34991359 Free PMC article.
-
Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):445-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774516643498. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Clin Trials. 2016. PMID: 27094487 Review.
-
Intra-cluster correlation selection for cluster randomized trials.Stat Med. 2016 Aug 30;35(19):3272-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.6922. Epub 2016 Feb 28. Stat Med. 2016. PMID: 26924419
-
Developing Statistical Methods to Improve Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Aug. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Aug. PMID: 38913814 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect sizes and intra-cluster correlation coefficients measured from the Green Dot High School study for guiding sample size calculations when designing future violence prevention cluster randomized trials in school settings.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Aug 11;23:100831. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100831. eCollection 2021 Sep. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021. PMID: 34430755 Free PMC article.
-
GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Mar;230:107362. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107362. Epub 2023 Jan 20. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023. PMID: 36709555 Free PMC article.
-
Primary Care Cluster RCT to Increase Diabetes Prevention Program Referrals.Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 May 14. Am J Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 32418801 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Testing the homogeneity of odds ratio across strata for combined bilateral and unilateral data.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0307276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307276. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39024202 Free PMC article.
-
Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17407745241244790. Epub 2024 Apr 22. Clin Trials. 2024. PMID: 38650332 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials