Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 18:(139):57923.
doi: 10.3791/57923.

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake

Affiliations

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake

Alice Meroni et al. J Vis Exp. .

Abstract

Different methods can be used in research to assess dietary intake, many of which are still paper-based. Written estimated food diaries are often utilized in clinical trials, despite being a burden for both study participants and researchers. This method requires participant literacy, it is time consuming, labor intensive, and can easily lead to under-reporting. With advancements in technology, there is a growing interest in electronic diaries that automate the dietary assessment process. These are focused on improving accuracy, reducing both time and cost and providing users with a visual and more enjoyable experience. The methodology presented here aimed to validate the 'Boden Food Plate', a novel web-based platform for self-recording of food and drink items, compared to a traditional estimated food diary. The application was also rated on a satisfaction scale by study participants using a paper-based questionnaire. Sixty-seven participants completed the dietary measures on both the three-day electronic and paper food diaries. For the analysis, only dietary data completed at both study time points (baseline and week six) was utilized. Despite small mean differences between dietary data collection methods, Bland Altman analysis showed fairly wide 95% limits of agreement between the electronic platform and the written estimated food diary and there were few cases which did not fall within the 95% confidence intervals. Overall, participants found the electronic food diary to be more fun than the paper method and as easy to use as hard copy diaries. The new platform has potential as a self-recording tool for the collection of dietary data, particularly when utilized in clinical trial settings. However, further validation studies are needed to improve the validity of this novel electronic dietary data collection tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Buzzard M. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford: University Press; 1998. 24-Hour dietary recall and food record methods; pp. 50–73.
    1. MacIntyre U. Introduction to Human Nutrition. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. Measuring food intake; pp. 238–275.
    1. Barrett-Connor E. Nutrition Epidemiology - How Do We Know What They Ate? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1991;54(1):S182–S187. - PubMed
    1. Black AE, et al. Measurements of Total-Energy Expenditure Provide Insights into the Validity of Dietary Measurements of Energy-Intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1993;93(5):572–579. - PubMed
    1. Rebro SM, et al. The effect of keeping food records on eating patterns. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1998;98(10):1163–1165. - PubMed

Publication types