Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 8;8(1):14933.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33015-8.

Angle-dependent electron-electron correlation in the single ionization of H2 in strong laser fields

Affiliations

Angle-dependent electron-electron correlation in the single ionization of H2 in strong laser fields

Wan-Yang Wu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The one-photon ionization and tunneling ionization of H2 exposed to strong XUV and infrared laser pulses are studied by numerically simulating the four-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation, which includes two-electron dynamics for arbitrary angle between the molecular axis and the laser polarization direction. In the one-photon single ionization of H2, one electron escapes fast and the other bound electron is not disturbed but remains in coherent superposition of two electronic states of [Formula: see text]. In another case, under the irradiation of strong infrared laser pulses, one electron tunnels through the laser-dressed Coulomb barrier, and the other bound electron has enough time to adapt to the potential of [Formula: see text] and thus is prone to transfer to the ground electronic state of [Formula: see text]. In the intermediate regime, between the one photon and tunneling regimes, this electron-electron correlation depends strongly on the laser frequency, laser intensity and on the angle between laser polarization and the molecular axis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electron probability distributions obtained by projecting the four-dimensional wave function of H2 onto two-dimensional wave function of H2+ in (a) 1g state and (b) 2u state, according to Eq. 9. The internuclear distance R is 5 a.u. (c) Probabilities of W1sσg, W2pσu, and (d) The ratio of W2pσu/W1sσg as a function of the internuclear distance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Singly ionized photoelectron momentum distributions at different laser polarization directions of TDSE results governed by Eq. 9 in the top row and SFA results governed by Eq. 6 in the bottom row. (a,c) For H2+ in the 1g state after single ionization. (d,e and f) For H2+ in the 2u state. The lower row represents corresponding results of SFA. All the calculations were carried out with ω = 2.28 a.u. and R = 5 a.u.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The θ-dependent single ionization probability (left column), ionization probabilities associated with the ground ionic state W1sσg (middle column, crosses) and the first excited ionic state W2pσu (middle column, diamonds), and the ratio of W2pσu/W1sσg (right column). The three rows from up to bottom are for the internuclear distances R = 1.67, 3.5 and 5 a.u., respectively. For better clarity, The probabilities of W2pσu in (b) and (e) have been multiplied by 100 and 8, respectively. All the calculations were carried out with photon energy ω = 2.28 a.u.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) The final probabilities of the first two states as a function of the photon energy. The solid and dashed lines represent excitations at polarization angle θ = 0 and π/2, respectively. The laser intensity I0 is 1014 W/cm2. (b) Ratios with crosses were obtained by probabilities of solid blue and solid black lines in (a), and the black solid line represents ratios of laser field intensity at 3 × 1014 W/cm2. All the calculations were carried out with internuclear distance R = 5 a.u.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Probability distributions of the bound electron in space (the left and middle columns) and momentum (the right column) representations at polarization angles θ = 0 (upper panels) and θ = π/2 (lower panels). (a and d) For wave function at t = 50 a.u., (b and e) for wave function at t = 85 a.u. (c and f) are the momentum distributions of (b and e), respectively. The photon energy is 0.057 a.u. and I0 = 2 × 1014 W/cm2. The calculations were carried out with internuclear distance R = 5 a.u.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Branching ratios as a function of laser field intensity. The black line represents results with 4D H2 model at R = 5 a.u. and ω = 0.114 a.u., the red line is the same with black line except that each electron has only one dimension (2D TDSE). The blue and green lines were obtained by the 2D model for R = 3.5 a.u., at ω = 0.114 and 0.076 a.u., respectively. (b) Branching ratios as a function of laser field wavelength. Other parameters are labeled.

Similar articles

References

    1. Krause JL, Schafer KJ, Kulander KC. High-order harmonic generation from atoms and ions in the high intensity regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992;68:3535. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corkum PB. Plasma perspective on strong-field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993;71:1994. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1994. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huismans Y, et al. Time-resolved holography with photoelectrons. Science. 2011;331:61. doi: 10.1126/science.1198450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schins JM, et al. Observation of laser-assisted Auger decay in argon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994;73:2180. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin JC, et al. Measurement of the ratio of double-to-single photoionization of helium at 2.8 keV using sychrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991;67:968. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.968. - DOI - PubMed