COMPARISON BETWEEN RELEASABLE SCLERAL BUCKLING AND VITRECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PHAKIC PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT
- PMID: 30300265
- PMCID: PMC6924933
- DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002348
COMPARISON BETWEEN RELEASABLE SCLERAL BUCKLING AND VITRECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PHAKIC PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficiency of releasable scleral buckling (RSB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the treatment of phakic patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Methods: The current study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. One hundred and ten eyes from 110 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy of Grade B or less were included in this study. The patients were randomly allocated into an RSB group and a PPV group. The functional and anatomical success was compared between groups.
Results: The primary anatomical success rate (PPV 41/43 [95.35%] and RSB 38/41 [92.68%]) and final anatomical success rate (PPV and RSB 100%) showed a nonsignificant difference. The best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and complications were not different between the groups. However, the incidence of cataract progression was higher in the PPV group (26 of 43 [60.47%]) than in the RSB group (4 of 41 [9.76%]) at the 12-month follow-up. The subfoveal choroidal thickness increased significantly in the RSB group 3 months after surgery, but no longer differed at the postoperative 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. The axial length had increased significantly 1 month after surgery, but the difference was no longer significant at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Conclusion: The RSB and PPV procedures have the same effects on the functional and anatomical success for patients with phakic primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Nevertheless, based on the few cases of intraocular complications and cataract progression, we believe that the RSB technique should be preferentially recommended.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any financial/conflicting interests to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2142-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.013. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 18054633 Clinical Trial.
-
Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):540-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00888.x. Epub 2007 Mar 9. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17355251 Clinical Trial.
-
Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 8;3(3):CD009562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30848830 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone versus Combined Scleral Buckling plus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Retinal Detachment.Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Feb;5(2):169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 25. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021. PMID: 32980532
-
Pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification versus pars plana vitrectomy only for treatment of phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02465-5. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 35986229
Cited by
-
Fibrotic Changes in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 25;26(3):1025. doi: 10.3390/ijms26031025. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 39940795 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vitrectomy versus scleral buckle for retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 25;14(1):17141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67318-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39060328 Free PMC article.
-
Metamorphopsia after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 18;18(1):168-177. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.01.21. eCollection 2025. Int J Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39829626 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical interventions for simple phakic fovea-splitting rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparative study of scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 10;11:1537416. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1537416. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39867930 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Machemer R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. XLI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:681–693. - PubMed
-
- Michaelson IC, Stein R. A national study on the prevention of retinal detachment. Isr J Med Sci 1972;8:1421–1423. - PubMed
-
- Ho CL, Chen KJ, See LC. Selection of scleral buckling for primary retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 2002;216:33–39. - PubMed
-
- Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT, et al. Anterior chamber depth is significantly decreased after scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology 2010;117:79–85. - PubMed