Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):360.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2285-2.

Coating the plate with antibiotic cement to treat early infection after fracture fixation with retention of the implants: a technical note

Affiliations

Coating the plate with antibiotic cement to treat early infection after fracture fixation with retention of the implants: a technical note

Xu-Sheng Qiu et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Local antibiotic therapy has gained increasing attraction in the prevention and treatment of fracture infection. However, no reports have used local antibiotic therapy in the management of early infection after fracture fixation with retention of implants.

Methods: The present surgical technique report the use of antibiotic impregnated bone cement in the management of early infection after fracture fixation. Initially, the fractures were fixed with plates. The average time from initial procedure to debridement was15 days (range 9 to 25 days). The infections were treated with irrigation, debridement, and retention of the implant. The lateral surface of the plates was coated with antibiotic cement and the bone defect was filled with antibiotic cement spacer after thorough debridement.

Results: Ten patients underwent this technique. The mean follow-up was 2.0 years (range 6 months to 4 years). The bone union rate was 100%, and the average time to bone healing was5.5 months.There was recurrence of infection in one patient before bone healing, but the implants were left in place until bone healed, and the infection was eradicated after implant removal.

Conclusion: Coating the plate with antibiotic cement is a simple technique which may play a role in the management of early infection after fracture fixation.

Keywords: Antibiotic impregnated bone cement; Fracture; Infection; Local antibiotic therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was authorized by the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower hospital (Ref. No. 115875). All patients or patient’s legal guardian gave written informed consent for inclusion in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish was obtained for the patients or patient’s legal guardian whose information appears in this publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 11-year-old male suffered an infection of the tibia after fracture fixation, he was treated with coated plate technique. The tibia fracture (a-b) was fixed with plate in the local hospital (c-d). He suffered an infection 9 days after surgery, the wound was breakdown and purulent drainage was seen (e). A thorough debridement was performed (f), the implant was still stable after debridement (g), therefore it was maintained and coated with antibiotic cement (h). The wound healed uneventfully after the surgery (i). The bone healed and no recurrent infection was seen at last follow-up (j-k)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 59-year-old male suffered calcaneus infection after fracture fixation, and was treated with irrigation, debridement, and retention of the implant combined with systemic and local antibiotic therapy. X-ray after fracture fixation showed the fracture was comminuted (a-b). 25 days after initial surgery, a thorough debridement was performed because of infection, two loose screws were removed, the plates were coated with antibiotic cement, and the bone defect was filled with antibiotic cement spacer (c-d). 8 months later, the bone cement(g) and the implants (h) were removed, and the cavity bone defect was filled with iliac bone grafts (i-j). At last follow- up, the bone was healed (e-f)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 64-year-old male suffered an infection of the proximal tibia 15 days after fracture fixation (a-b). A thorough debridement was performed (c). The plates were coated with antibiotic cement, and the bone defect was filled with antibiotic cement spacer (d-f). Because of compromised soft-tissue envelope, soft tissue reconstruction was performed (g). Two months later, the cement was removed from the bone defect through medial approach and the bone defect was filled with iliac bone grafts (h-i). However, the infection recurred 6 months after bone grafting (j). The implants were left in place until cortical bone healed (k-l). Then, the implants were removed and through debridement was performed, the cavity bone defect was filled with bone cement again. No recurrent infection was seen at last follow-up (m-n)

References

    1. Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(14):1422–1429. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035415. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saddawi-Konefka D, Kim HM, Chung KC. A systematic review of outcomes and complications of reconstruction and amputation for type IIIB and IIIC fractures of the tibia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1796–1805. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818d69c3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willenegger H, Roth B. Treatment tactics and late results in early infection following osteosynthesis. Unfallchirurgie. 1986;12(5):241–246. doi: 10.1007/BF02586085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metsemakers W.J., Kuehl R., Moriarty T.F., Richards R.G., Verhofstad M.H.J., Borens O., Kates S., Morgenstern M. Infection after fracture fixation: Current surgical and microbiological concepts. Injury. 2018;49(3):511–522. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barth RE, Vogely HC, Hoepelman AI, Peters EJ. ‘To bead or not to bead?’ treatment of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint-associated infections with gentamicin bead chains. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(5):371–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.03.008. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms