Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 13:2018:4283427.
doi: 10.1155/2018/4283427. eCollection 2018.

Social Cognition through the Lens of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience

Affiliations
Review

Social Cognition through the Lens of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience

Maria Arioli et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Social cognition refers to a set of processes, ranging from perception to decision-making, underlying the ability to decode others' intentions and behaviors to plan actions fitting with social and moral, besides individual and economic considerations. Its centrality in everyday life reflects the neural complexity of social processing and the ubiquity of social cognitive deficits in different pathological conditions. Social cognitive processes can be clustered in three domains associated with (a) perceptual processing of social information such as faces and emotional expressions (social perception), (b) grasping others' cognitive or affective states (social understanding), and (c) planning behaviors taking into consideration others', in addition to one's own, goals (social decision-making). We review these domains from the lens of cognitive neuroscience, i.e., in terms of the brain areas mediating the role of such processes in the ability to make sense of others' behavior and plan socially appropriate actions. The increasing evidence on the "social brain" obtained from healthy young individuals nowadays constitutes the baseline for detecting changes in social cognitive skills associated with physiological aging or pathological conditions. In the latter case, impairments in one or more of the abovementioned domains represent a prominent concern, or even a core facet, of neurological (e.g., acquired brain injury or neurodegenerative diseases), psychiatric (e.g., schizophrenia), and developmental (e.g., autism) disorders. To pave the way for the other papers of this issue, addressing the social cognitive deficits associated with severe acquired brain injury, we will briefly discuss the available evidence on the status of social cognition in normal aging and its breakdown in neurodegenerative disorders. Although the assessment and treatment of such impairments is a relatively novel sector in neurorehabilitation, the evidence summarized here strongly suggests that the development of remediation procedures for social cognitive skills will represent a future field of translational research in clinical neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Empathy and mentalizing. The figure depicts Shamay-Tsoori et al.'s [91] model of the relationship between the key processes of social understanding, i.e., empathy and mentalizing. According to the model, cognitive mentalizing is a prerequisite for affective mentalizing, which however interacts with emotional empathy. Reproduced with permission from Shamay-Tsoori, Harari, Aharon-Peretz, and Levckovitz, [91].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Brain networks of social cognition. Meta-analytic evidence for the neural networks underlying social perception (a), action observation (mirror system) (b), and mentalizing (Theory of Mind system) (c). As shown in the bottom sector of the figure, these three networks overlap in the STS, a crucial hub of the social brain providing inputs to both the mirror and mentalizing systems [66]. Reproduced with permission from Yang, Rosenblau, Keifer, and Pelphrey, An Integrative Neural Model of Social Perception, Action Observation, and Theory of Mind, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51 (2015) 263–275, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.020.

References

    1. Frith C. D., Frith U. Social Cognition in Humans. Current Biology. 2007;17(16):R724–R732. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott R. M., Baillargeon R. Early False-Belief Understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2017;21(4):237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krupenye C., Kano F., Hirata S., Call J., Tomasello M. Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science. 2016;354(6308):110–114. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slaughter V., Imuta K., Peterson C., Henry J. Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Development. 2014;86(4):1159–1174. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12372. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones D. E., Greenberg M., Crowley M. Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(11):2283–2290. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources