Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 May;23(5):2395-2402.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2691-8. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

Comparative evaluation of autofluorescence imaging and histopathological investigation for oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of autofluorescence imaging and histopathological investigation for oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan

Tien-En Chiang et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Autofluorescence imaging is gaining popularity as an adjunctive test for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). This study evaluated the efficacy of autofluorescence imaging based on the current standard oral mucosal disorder checklist in Taiwan.

Materials and methods: In total, 126 patients suspected to have mucosal disorders at the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, were enrolled. Following a conventional oral examination by using the oral mucosal disorder checklist and an autofluorescence imaging examination, all participants underwent histopathological examination to access epithelial dysplasia.

Results: Among 126 patients, 68 patients were diagnosis as having an OPMD and 63 having epithelial dysplasia. Autofluorescence imaging exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, positivity predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 77.94%, 35.42%, 63.10%, 53.13%, and 60.34%, respectively, for OPMD and of 88.89%, 43.86%, 63.64%, 78.13%, and 67.50%, respectively, for epithelial dysplasia. After the exclusion of 48 non-OPMD cases according to the checklist, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of autofluorescence imaging became 87.50%, 72.73%, 94.23%, 53.33%, and 85.07%, respectively, for epithelial dysplasia.

Conclusion: The efficacy of epithelial dysplasia identification and OPMD risk assessment can be increased after the exclusion of the non-OPMD cases through autofluorescence imaging.

Clinical relevance: Autofluorescence imaging is a useful adjunct that can assist specialists in assessing OPMD patients prone to dysplasia without compromising patient care.

Keywords: Autofluorescence; Oral potentially malignant disorders; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Cancer. 2000 Jun;82(11):1871-4 - PubMed
    1. J Oral Pathol Med. 2001 Apr;30(4):213-9 - PubMed
    1. Oral Dis. 2001 Jan;7(1):18-24 - PubMed
    1. Photochem Photobiol. 2001 Jun;73(6):636-41 - PubMed
    1. Biochemistry. 2003 May 13;42(18):5414-20 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources