Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204353.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204353. eCollection 2018.

Body inversion effect in monkeys

Affiliations

Body inversion effect in monkeys

Toyomi Matsuno et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Humans visually process human body images depending on the configuration of the parts. However, little is known about whether this function is evolutionarily shared with nonhuman animals. In this study, we examined the body posture discrimination performance of capuchin monkeys, a highly social platyrrhine primate, in comparison to humans. We demonstrate that, like humans, monkeys exhibit a body inversion effect: body posture discrimination is impaired by inversion, which disrupts the configural relationships of body parts. The inversion effect in monkeys was observed when human body images were used, but not when the body parts were replaced with cubic and cylindrical figures, the positions of the parts were scrambled, or only part of a body was presented. Results in human participants showed similar patterns, though they also showed the inversion effect when the cubic/cylindrical body images were used. These results provide the first evidence for configural processing of body forms in monkeys and suggest that the visual attunement to social signals mediated by body postures is conserved through the evolution of primate vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Examples of upright stimuli used in the experiments.
(A and B) Whole body postures. (C) Cubic/cylindrical body postures. (D) Part body postures. (E) Scrambled body postures.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mean percentages of correct responses and mean response times for correct trials in pretest sessions for monkeys.
Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. **p < .01.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Mean percentages of correct responses and mean response times for correct trials in Experiments 1 to 4.
Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. **p < .01.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Mean percentages of correct responses and mean response times for correct trials in Experiments with humans.
Error bars indicate bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. *p < .05, **p < .01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Call J, Tomasello M, editors. The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
    1. Downing PE, Jiang YH, Shuman M, Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science. 2001;293(5539):2470–3. 10.1126/science.1063414 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peelen MV, Downing PE. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(8):636–48. 10.1038/nrn2195 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein T, Sterzer P, Peelen MV. Privileged detection of conspecifics: evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression. Cognition. 2012;125(1):64–79. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downing PE, Bray D, Rogers J, Childs C. Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected. Cognition. 2004;93(1):B27–38. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.010 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types