Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0203951.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203951. eCollection 2018.

Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single- and mixed-species

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single- and mixed-species

Norberto Martins de Oliveira Junior et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To verify whether the Ultra Corega Cream and Corega Strip Denture Adhesive adhesives interfere in the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Lactobacillus casei in single- and mixed-species settings, and observe whether synergistic or antagonistic relationships between these species occur.

Methods: Specimens made from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 550) were fabricated (n = 144) with a circular shape and standardized roughness (3.0 μm ±0.3 Ra) and were divided into three groups: Without Adhesive (WA), with Ultra Corega Cream adhesive (CA) and Corega Strips adhesive (SA). These groups were divided into three subgroups each: C. albicans single-species, L. casei single-species and C. albicans with L. casei (mixed-species). Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation assays were performed in duplicate at four distinct experimental times (n = 8 per experimental condition). The amount of each microorganism on the surfaces of the specimens was observed by counting of the Colony Forming Units (CFU) per substrate. Additional specimens were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with 18 specimens being used in this analysis (n = 18), 2 per experimental condition (n = 2). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons were employed, using α≤0.05.

Results: L. casei (mixed-species) adhered more on the WA substrate than the CA, while C. albicans (single- and mixed-species) adhered more on the SA. C. albicans, both single- and mixed-species adhered more than the L. casei (single- and mixed-species), regardless of the substrate. L. casei (single-species) formed more biofilm on the WA, but in its mixed cultivation, it had no difference of growth among the tested situations. C. albicans (single- and mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than the CA, and the fungus formed more biofilm when compared to L. casei. In general, whenever a species was compared in its single- and mixed-species situation, no statistically significant difference was observed. SEM of biofilm formation assays demonstrated that L. casei single-species WA formed more biofilm than when the adhesives tested were used, and C. albicans (both single- and mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than on the CA.

Conclusions: (1) The two denture adhesives tested increased the adhesion of C. albicans but not of L. casei; (2) biofilm formation by C. albicans (single- and mixed-species) was increased on the SA; (3) Relations of synergism or antagonism was not observed between the two microorganisms studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Organization of inocula with different groups of microorganisms and experimental conditions.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Graph comparing the CFU count during the adhesion experiments in the different experimental conditions.
Same low caption letter means no statistical significant difference per surface condition analyzed. Same upper caption letter means no significant difference for species and cultivation condition (single or mixed).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Graph comparing the CFU count during the biofilm experiments in the different experimental conditions.
Same low caption letter means no statistical significant difference per surface condition analyzed. Same upper caption letter means no significant difference for species and cultivation condition (single or mixed).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Candida albicans single-species with Cream adhesive.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Candida albicans single-species with Strips adhesive.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Candida albicans single-species Without adhesive.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Candida albicans mixed-species with Cream adhesive.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Candida albicans mixed-species with Strips adhesive.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Candida albicans mixed-species Without adhesive.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Lactobacillus casei single-species with Cream adhesive.
Fig 11
Fig 11. Lactobacillus casei single-species with Strips adhesive.
Fig 12
Fig 12. Lactobacillus casei single-species Without adhesive.
Fig 13
Fig 13. Lactobacillus casei mixed-species with Cream adhesive.
Fig 14
Fig 14. Lactobacillus casei mixed-species with Strips adhesive.
Fig 15
Fig 15. Lactobacillus casei mixed-species Without adhesive.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coates AJ. Usage of denture adhesives. J Dent. 2000;28:137–40. - PubMed
    1. Oliveira Junior NM, Rodriguez LS, Mendoza Marin DO, Paleari AG, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Masticatory performance of complete denture wearers after using two adhesives: A crossover randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2014,112:1182–7. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panagiotouni E, Pissiotis A, Kapari D, Kaloyannides A. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:578–85. - PubMed
    1. Pradíes G, Sanz I, Evans O, Martínez F, Sanz M. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:361–7. - PubMed
    1. Tarib NA, Bakar MT, Murat MDTA, Ahmad M, Kamarudin KH. Masticatory effect and bite force in complete dentures: a study of denture adhesive. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:67–73.

Publication types

MeSH terms