Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit
- PMID: 30304059
- PMCID: PMC6179208
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204105
Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit
Abstract
Background: Vascular transit time (VTT) is the propagation time of a pulse wave through an artery; it is a measure for arterial stiffness. Because reliable non-invasive VTT measurements are difficult, as an alternative we measure pulse transit time (PTT). PTT is defined as the time between the R-wave on electrocardiogram and arrival of the resulting pulse wave in a distal location measured with photoplethysmography (PPG). The time between electrical activation of the ventricles and the resulting pulse wave after opening of the aortic valve is called the pre-ejection period (PEP), a component of PTT. The aim of this study was to estimate the variability of PEP at rest, to establish how accurate PTT is as approximation of VTT.
Methods: PTT was measured and PEP was assessed with echocardiography (gold standard) in three groups of 20 volunteers: 1) a control group without cardiovascular disease aged <50 years and 2) aged >50 years, and 3) a group with cardiovascular risk factors, defined as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney failure and diabetes mellitus.
Results: Per group, the mean PEP was: 1) 58.5 ± 13.0 ms, 2) 52.4 ± 11.9 ms, and 3) 57.6 ± 11.6 ms. However, per individual the standard deviation was much smaller, i.e. 1) 2.0-5.9 ms, 2) 2.8-5.1 ms, and 3) 1.6-12.0 ms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean PEP of the 3 groups (p = 0.236).
Conclusion: In conclusion, the intra-individual variability of PEP is small. A change in PTT in a person at rest is most probably the result of a change in VTT rather than of PEP. Thus, PTT at rest is an easy, non-invasive and accurate approximation of VTT for monitoring arterial stiffness.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Pre-ejection period, the reason why the electrocardiogram Q-wave is an unreliable indicator of pulse wave initialization.Physiol Meas. 2018 Sep 24;39(9):095005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aada72. Physiol Meas. 2018. PMID: 30109991
-
Pulse arrival time as a surrogate of blood pressure.Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01358-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34815419 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of noninvasive pulse transit time estimates as markers of blood pressure using invasive pulse transit time measurements as a reference.Physiol Rep. 2016 May;4(10):e12768. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12768. Physiol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27233300 Free PMC article.
-
Pulse transit time by R-wave-gated infrared photoplethysmography: review of the literature and personal experience.J Clin Monit Comput. 2004 Dec;18(5-6):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s10877-005-4300-z. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004. PMID: 15957624 Review.
-
Pulse transit time as an indirect marker for variations in cardiovascular related reactivity.Technol Health Care. 2006;14(2):97-108. Technol Health Care. 2006. PMID: 16720953 Review.
Cited by
-
Pulse transit time estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity and blood pressure using machine learning and simulated training data.PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 15;15(8):e1007259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007259. eCollection 2019 Aug. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019. PMID: 31415554 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between pulse wave velocities measured using Complior and measured using Biopac.J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Apr;33(2):241-247. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0165-9. Epub 2018 Jun 6. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019. PMID: 29876710 Free PMC article.
-
The pre-ejection period is a highly stress dependent parameter of paramount importance for pulse-wave-velocity based applications.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 15;10:1138356. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1138356. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 36873391 Free PMC article.
-
Are Wearable Photoplethysmogram-Based Heart Rate Variability Measures Equivalent to Electrocardiogram? A Simulation Study.Sports Med. 2024 Nov;54(11):2927-2934. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02066-5. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38935328
-
A method for blood pressure hydrostatic pressure correction using wearable inertial sensors and deep learning.NPJ Biosens. 2025;2(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s44328-024-00021-y. Epub 2025 Jan 31. NPJ Biosens. 2025. PMID: 39897702 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nitzan M, Khanokh B, Slovik Y. The difference in pulse transit time to the toe and finger measured by photoplethysmography. Physiol Meas. 2002;23(1):85–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous