Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204105.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204105. eCollection 2018.

Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit

Minke C Kortekaas  1 , Marit H N van Velzen  1 , Frank Grüne  1 , Sjoerd P Niehof  1 , Robert J Stolker  1 , Frank J P M Huygen  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit

Minke C Kortekaas et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Vascular transit time (VTT) is the propagation time of a pulse wave through an artery; it is a measure for arterial stiffness. Because reliable non-invasive VTT measurements are difficult, as an alternative we measure pulse transit time (PTT). PTT is defined as the time between the R-wave on electrocardiogram and arrival of the resulting pulse wave in a distal location measured with photoplethysmography (PPG). The time between electrical activation of the ventricles and the resulting pulse wave after opening of the aortic valve is called the pre-ejection period (PEP), a component of PTT. The aim of this study was to estimate the variability of PEP at rest, to establish how accurate PTT is as approximation of VTT.

Methods: PTT was measured and PEP was assessed with echocardiography (gold standard) in three groups of 20 volunteers: 1) a control group without cardiovascular disease aged <50 years and 2) aged >50 years, and 3) a group with cardiovascular risk factors, defined as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney failure and diabetes mellitus.

Results: Per group, the mean PEP was: 1) 58.5 ± 13.0 ms, 2) 52.4 ± 11.9 ms, and 3) 57.6 ± 11.6 ms. However, per individual the standard deviation was much smaller, i.e. 1) 2.0-5.9 ms, 2) 2.8-5.1 ms, and 3) 1.6-12.0 ms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean PEP of the 3 groups (p = 0.236).

Conclusion: In conclusion, the intra-individual variability of PEP is small. A change in PTT in a person at rest is most probably the result of a change in VTT rather than of PEP. Thus, PTT at rest is an easy, non-invasive and accurate approximation of VTT for monitoring arterial stiffness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Pre-ejection period.
A, electrocardiogram; B, Doppler mode echocardiography signal over the aortic valve; C, photoplethysmographic pulse wave. PEP = pre-ejection period, VTT = vascular transit time, PTT = pulse transit time.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Box plots of the pre-ejection period (PEP) of 10 consecutive heartbeats of the 20 participants and of the total group.
Group 1: control group aged <50 years. Group 2: control group aged >50 years. Group 3: participants with a cardiovascular risk factor. The boxes represent the median with interquartile range. The whiskers represent the minimum and maximum value.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Contribution of the PEP (mean and SD) to the PTT for each sensor of group 1 (control group aged <50 years).
All values are normalized to a percentage (%) of the mean PTT (which is 100%) of the specific sensor. PTTMean% of left hand (n = 19) 100%±3.1%, PTTMean% of right hand (n = 20): 100%±2.4% (p = 0.004). Contribution of PEPMean% for PTT of left versus right hand 22.2%±1.3% versus 21.0%±1.3%. PTTMean% of left big toe (n = 18) 100%±4.7%, PTTMean% right big toe (n = 17) 100%±4.8%. Contribution of PEPMean% for left big toe versus right big toe 16.5%±1.0% versus 16.3%±1.0%.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Contribution of the PEP (mean and SD) to the PTT for each sensor of group 2 (control group aged >50 years).
All values are normalized to a percentage (%) of the mean PTT (which is 100%) of the specific sensor. PTTMean% of left hand (n = 19) 100%±3.5%, PTT of right hand (n = 20) 100%±2.6%. Contribution of PEPMean% for PTT of left versus right hand PEP 18.7%±1.4% versus PEP 19.4%±1.4%. PTTMean% of left big toe (n = 18) 100%±5.9%, PTTMean% right big toe (n = 17) PTT 100%±6.3%. Contribution of PEPMean% for left big toe versus right big toe 4.8%±1.1% versus 5.1%±1.1%.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Columns represent the contribution of the PEP (mean and SD) to the PTT for each sensor of group 3 (participants with a cardiovascular risk factor).
All values are normalized to a percentage (%) of the mean PTT (which is 100%) of the specific sensor. PTTMean% of left hand (n = 19) 100%±5.5%, PTT of right hand (n = 20) 100%±4.2%. Contribution of PEPMean% for PTT of left versus right hand 20.7%±1.5% versus 20.3%±1.4%. PTTMean% of left big toe (n = 15) 100%±7.3%, PTTMean% right big toe (n = 14) 100%±9.1%. Contribution of PEPMean% for left big toe versus right big toe 17.6%±1.3% versus 17.7%±1.4%.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nitzan M, Khanokh B, Slovik Y. The difference in pulse transit time to the toe and finger measured by photoplethysmography. Physiol Meas. 2002;23(1):85–93. - PubMed
    1. Suurland J, van der Heijden KB, Huijbregts SCJ, van Goozen SHM, Swaab H. Infant Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Activity during Baseline, Stress and Recovery: Interactions with Prenatal Adversity Predict Physical Aggression in Toddlerhood. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang A, Tao J, Guo X, Liu X, Luo Y, Liu X, et al. The product of resting heart rate times blood pressure is associated with high brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107852 10.1371/journal.pone.0107852 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muehlsteff J, Aubert XL, Schuett M. Cuffless estimation of systolic blood pressure for short effort bicycle tests: the prominent role of the pre-ejection period. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:5088–92. 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260275 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang G, Gao M, Xu D, Olivier NB, Mukkamala R. Pulse arrival time is not an adequate surrogate for pulse transit time as a marker of blood pressure. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(6):1681–6. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00980.2011 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types