You Are Not My Handler! Impact of Changing Handlers on Dogs' Behaviours and Detection Performance
- PMID: 30304841
- PMCID: PMC6211013
- DOI: 10.3390/ani8100176
You Are Not My Handler! Impact of Changing Handlers on Dogs' Behaviours and Detection Performance
Abstract
Dog-handler relationships can directly impact team success. Changing a dog's handler may therefore compromise detection performance. However, there are currently few studies which support this. This research explored the performance and behavioural impact of changing a dog's handler. Nine dogs trained at scent detection were accuracy tested with a familiar and unfamiliar handler. Both handlers were female with similar dog handling experience. The dogs were tested along brick lines containing target, non-target, and control samples. Testing was separated into four sessions, with each session having 36 samples. The dogs' accuracy scores were then calculated and testing footage behaviour coded. The dogs had significantly higher sensitivity (p = 0.045) and negative predictive value (NPV) (p = 0.041) scores when handled by the familiar handler. With the unfamiliar handler the dogs performed more stress-related behaviours, and were distracted for a higher proportion of time (p = 0.012). Time spent distracted was negatively correlated to detection performance (correlation = -0.923, p < 0.001). With the unfamiliar handler the dogs' performance did not improve throughout testing (p = 0.553). This research demonstrates how these dogs' detection performances were impacted by changing handlers. Future research is required to determine if professional dog-handler teams are impacted similarly.
Keywords: behaviour; detection performance; dog handler; dogs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Therapy Dogs' and Handlers' Behavior and Salivary Cortisol During Initial Visits in a Complex Medical Institution: A Pilot Study.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 13;7:564201. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.564201. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33282927 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Handler Knowledge of the Detection Task on Canine Search Behavior and Performance.Front Vet Sci. 2020 May 27;7:250. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00250. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 32528982 Free PMC article.
-
Scent of the familiar: an fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors.Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Behav Processes. 2015. PMID: 24607363
-
Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs' behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks.Behav Processes. 2009 Jul;81(3):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.015. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19520242 Review.
-
Conservation detection dogs: A critical review of efficacy and methodology.Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e10866. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10866. eCollection 2024 Feb. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38371867 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Who's a Good Handler? Important Skills and Personality Profiles of Wildlife Detection Dog Handlers.Animals (Basel). 2018 Nov 27;8(12):222. doi: 10.3390/ani8120222. Animals (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30486469 Free PMC article.
-
The use of mantrailing dogs in police and judicial context, future directions, limits and possibilities - A law review.Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Oct 4;7:100439. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100439. eCollection 2023. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023. PMID: 37840560 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selecting Dogs for Explosives Detection: Behavioral Characteristics.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 2;7:597. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00597. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33088829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhancing the Selection and Performance of Working Dogs.Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 12;8:644431. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.644431. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34055947 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Use of Biological Sensors and Instrumental Analysis to Discriminate COVID-19 Odor Signatures.Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):1003. doi: 10.3390/bios12111003. Biosensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36421122 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hemsworth J.L., Barnett J.L., Coleman G.J. The integration of human-animal relations into animal welfare monitoring schemes. Anim. Welf. 2009;18:335–345. doi: 10.1308/003588409X464603. - DOI
-
- Rohlf V.I., Bennett P.C., Toukhsati S., Coleman G. Why do even committed dog owners fail to comply with some responsible ownership practices? Anthrozoös. 2010;23:143–155. doi: 10.2752/175303710X12682332909972. - DOI
-
- Rohlf V.I., Bennett P.C., Toukhsati S., Coleman G. Beliefs underlying dog owners’ health care behaviors: Results from a large, self-selected, internet sample. Anthrozoös. 2012;25:171–185. doi: 10.2752/175303712X13316289505341. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources