Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 9;23(10):2582.
doi: 10.3390/molecules23102582.

Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples

Affiliations

Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples

Żaneta Bargańska et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Developed and validated analytical methods for the determination of a wide spectrum of pesticide residues in honey and honeybee samples after the modification of QuEChERS extraction in combination with gas chromatography⁻tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography⁻tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were discussed and compared. The developed methods were evaluated regarding the utilized equipment and reagents using Eco-Scale and compared in terms of extraction time, accuracy, precision, sensitivity and versatility, with similar procedures. The results proved that the QuEChERS protocol in combination with LC and GC techniques fulfills the requirements of green analytical chemistry, so it can be used as a tool in environmental monitoring. The recovery was 85⁻116% for honey and 85.5⁻103.5% for honeybee samples. The developed methods were successfully applied in monitoring real samples collected from three districts of Pomerania in Poland. Analysis of real samples revealed the presence of the following pesticides: bifenthrin, fenpyroximate, methidathione, spinosad, thiamethoxam, triazophos, metconazole and cypermethrin at levels higher than the MRLs established by the EU.

Keywords: Eco-Scale; GC-MS/MS; LC-MS/MS; QuEChERS; environmental monitoring; honey; honeybees; pesticides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in recovery found during the extraction process when using 3 mL versus 1.5 mL of n-hexane for removing wax from honeybee samples using modified QuEChERS method for selected pesticides.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of matrix effects for selected pesticides: A Honey B Honeybee.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Information on the identification and detection of the selected analytes using the developed analytical methods (LC and GC).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The sample chromatograms obtained during analysis of extracts from real sample in which selected pesticide residues was detected above MRLs level: A—honey samples, B—honeybee samples.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scheme of pesticide extraction procedures from honey and honeybee samples using the QuEChERS extraction before final analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chiesa L.M., Labella G.F., Giorgi A., Panseri S., Pavlovic R., Bonacci S., Arioli F. The occurrence of pesticides and persistent organic pollutants in Italian organic honeys from different productive areas in relation to potential environmental pollution. Chemosphere. 2016;154:482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panseri S., Manzo A., Chiesa L.M., Giorgi A. Melissopallynological and volatile compounds analysis of buckwheat honey from different geographical origins and their role in botanical determination. J. Chem. 2013;2013:904202. doi: 10.1155/2013/904202. - DOI
    1. Bargańska Ż., Namieśnik J. Pesticide Analysis of Bee and Bee Product Samples. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2010;40:159–171. doi: 10.1080/10408347.2010.490484. - DOI
    1. Dong H., Xiao K., Xian Y., Wu Y. Authenticity determination of honeys with non-extractable proteins by means of elemental analyzer (EA) and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to isotope ratio mass spectroscopy (IRMS) Food Chem. 2018;240:717–724. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dong H., Luo D., Xian Y., Luo H., Guo X., Li C., Zhao M. Adulteration identification of commercial honey with the C-4 sugar content of negative values by an elemental analyzer and liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016;64:3258–3265. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00691. - DOI - PubMed