Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 11;19(1):258.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1048-5.

Diagnosis and management of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

Affiliations

Diagnosis and management of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

Gesine F C Weckmann et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is age-dependent and has a high prevalence in the general population. Most patients are managed in ambulatory care. This systematic review provides an updated overview of quality and content of international clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and management of non-dialysis CKD relevant to patients in ambulatory care.

Methods: We identified guidelines published from 2012-to March 2018 in guideline portals, databases and by manual search. Methodological quality was assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Recommendations were extracted and evaluated.

Results: Eight hundred fifty-two publications were identified, 9 of which were eligible guidelines. Methodological quality ranged from 34 to 77%, with domains "scope and purpose" and "clarity of presentation" attaining highest and "applicability" lowest scores. Guidelines were similar in recommendations on CKD definition, screening of patients with diabetes and hypertension, blood pressure targets and referral of patients with progressive or stage G4 CKD. Definition of high risk groups and recommended tests in newly diagnosed CKD varied.

Conclusions: Guidelines quality ranged from moderate to high. Guidelines generally agreed on management of patients with high risk or advanced CKD, but varied in regarding the range of recommended measurements, the need for referrals to nephrology, monitoring intervals and comprehensiveness. More research is needed on efficient management of patients with low risk of CKD progression to end stage renal disease.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; Clinical practice guideline; Management; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of results of literature search and guideline selection

References

    1. KDOQI Clinical practice guideline for diabetes and CKD: 2012 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:850–886. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levey Andrew S., Eckardt Kai-Uwe, Tsukamoto Yusuke, Levin Adeera, Coresh Josef, Rossert Jerome, Zeeuw Dick D.E., Hostetter Thomas H., Lameire Norbert, Eknoyan Garabed. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Kidney International. 2005;67(6):2089–2100. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan T. Chronic kidney disease (stages 3–5) prevalence estimates using data from the Neoerica study (2007). England: Association of Public Health Observatories; 2009.
    1. Kearns B. Chronic kidney disease prevalence modelling briefing document. 2009.
    1. Stevens PE, O'Donoghue DJ, de LS, van Vlymen J, Klebe B, Middleton R, et al. Chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom: NEOERICA project results. Kidney Int. 2007;72:92–99. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002273. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types